[Serusers] [jcollins at asgardsrealm.net: Routing difference between 0.8.10 and 0.8.12]

[Jan Janak]

Jamin,

It's a bug in ser which was introduced when we wanted to make ser more
interoperable with implementations that remove unknown parameters from
Record-Route header fields. I will revert the changes and that will eliminate
the problem with Snom.

Thanks for the report.

  Jan.

On 22-12 16:24, Jan Janak wrote:
> On 22-12 07:57, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > I took a look at the specification, but didn't see anything (from my
> > limited understanding) that would indicate that Snom was doing anything
> > against the spec.  So, if (and I know it's a big if with my
> > understanding of SIP and the spec) they are within the spec then
> > wouldn't it need to be SER that made the change?
> 
>   I am not sure about this yet. As far as I know nobody else is
>   using preloaded route set this way. I have to review the spec
>   thoroughly. Anyway I will get back to it after the holidays.
> 
>    Jan.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers