[Serusers] cisco pix and ser

[Jiri Kuthan]

My ethereal is fine and it indeed shows that the ALG left private IP addresses
in Record-routes -- i.e., follow-up requests are unroutable. There is indeed 
nothing we can do about a misfunctioning ALG (imho, ALGs are conceptually 
very suboptimal design).

-jiri

At 05:18 PM 2/25/2004, Jan Janak wrote:
>I do not see any record-route header fields in the second dumps. But my
>ethereal complains about corrupted files, so maybe it does not display
>all the messages.
>
>Anyway, if the problem is PIX not rewriting Record-Route then I am
>afraid I could not help you.
>
>  Jan.
>
>On 23-02 15:10, laurent Schweizer wrote:
>> yes (ethereal dumps), the first is a local dump (on ser proxy ) and the
>> second is after the pix.
>> 
>> as you can see, the ip address of the record route in the invite is not
>> changed (after the pix), so i think that, the sip.eyepmedia.com proxy try to
>> send the bye request to this wrong address
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan at iptel.org]
>> Sent: lundi, 23. février 2004 14:01
>> To: laurent Schweizer
>> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> Subject: Re: [Serusers] cisco pix and ser
>> 
>> 
>> Could you post SIP message dumps ?
>> 
>>  Jan.
>> 
>> On 23-02 14:01, laurent Schweizer wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I want to know if somebody has already tested the cisco PIX (with NAT and
>> > SIP alg).
>> >
>> > because when i use it with ser and record-route then BYE messages are not
>> > correctly routed
>> >
>> > Laurent
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Serusers mailing list
>> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/