[Serusers] NAT

[Klaus Darilion]

Shirley Toh wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> thank you for your reply and your explaination! :)
> 
> The record_routing that you are refering to is the save("location") to store
> into the database or what you meant by record_routing? Please
> advise...thanks.
> 
> regards, 
> shirley
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From:	Klaus Darilion [SMTP:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at]
>>Sent:	Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:21 PM
>>To:	Shirley Toh
>>Cc:	SER Users (E-mail)
>>Subject:	Re: [Serusers] NAT
>>
>>ser without record-routing: only the INVITE transaction traverses the 
>>proxy, all other messages will be sent directly between the UAs.
>>
>>ser with record-routing: all the SIP messages traverse the proxy, the 
>>RTP data is sent directly between both UAs.
>>
>>ser with record-route and rtpproxy: all SIP messages traverese the SIP 
>>proxy and all RTP packets traverse the rtpproxy.
>>
>>
>>aklsu
>>
>>
>>Shirley Toh wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi, 
>>>
>>>Can anyone tell me is SER is routing UA directly out and connect two UA
>>>directly or is it connect to SER always to do the transmission of data.
>>>Please advice?
>>>
>>>Regards, 
>>>Shirley
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
>