[Serusers] windows messenger problems
casey attwell
casey at xstreamip.net
Fri Dec 10 12:37:40 CET 2004
Anyone got any help on this issue?
Windows Messeneger doesn't deliver messages to other users, and voice calls
only have one way audio dependant on who initiated the call!
I have rtpproxy running and ser says support for it is enabled clients sign
in behind NAT and all of that is ok with mysql auth etc
Here is my ser.cfg file
debug=9 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E)
/* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode
fork=no
log_stderror=yes
*/
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
port=5060
children=4
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
listen=83.245.0.21
alias="xstreamip.net"
fifo_mode=0777
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri.so"
#loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/group.so"
# Uncomment this if you want digest authentication
# mysql.so must be loaded !
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
# !! Nathelper
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
# -- usrloc params --
#modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
# for persistent storage and comment the previous line
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:xxxx@localhost/ser")
modparam("group", "db_url", "mysql://ser:xxxx@localhost/ser") # "mysql"
instead of "sql" in cvs head vs.
modparam("uri", "db_url", "mysql://ser:xxxx@localhost/ser") # instead of
"uri"
# -- auth params --
# Uncomment if you are using auth module
#
modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
#
# If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config),
# uncomment also the following parameter)
#
modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
# -- rr params --
# add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
# !! Nathelper
modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s
modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT
modparam("nathelper","rtpproxy_sock", "/var/run/rtpproxy.sock")
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
# initial sanity checks -- messages with
# max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (msg:len >= max_len ) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
break;
};
# !! Nathelper
# Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is
# executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses
# in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also,
# the received test should, if completed, should check all
# vias for rpesence of received
if (nat_uac_test("3")) {
# Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that
# a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is
# a REGISTER
if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) {
log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP,
rewriting\n");
# This will work only for user agents that support
symmetric
# communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is
# smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes
a configuration
# option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes,
with kphone it is
# called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling".
fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of
signalling
if (method == "INVITE") {
fix_nated_sdp("3"); # Add direction=active to SDP
};
force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via
setflag(6); # Mark as NATed
};
};
# we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
# subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
# particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
# use different transport protocol
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
log(1,"route messages");
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the
# path determined by record-routing
if (loose_route()) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
route(1);
break; };
# if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc
# (in case, it does not work, use the following command
# with proper names and addresses in it)
if (uri=~"xstreamip.net") {
if (method=="REGISTER") {
# Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
if (!www_authorize("xstreamip.net", "subscriber")) {
www_challenge("xstreamip.net", "0");
t_on_reply("1");
append_hf("P-Behind-NAT: Yes\r\n");
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
break;
};
log(1, "www_challenge sent\n");
break;
};
save("location");
break;
};
lookup("aliases");
save("aliases");
log(1,"log messages");
if (!uri==myself) {
append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
# native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
break;
};
};
append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
route(1);
}
route[1]
{
# !! Nathelper
if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" &&
!search("^Route:")){
sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP
addresses");
break;
};
# if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay
if (isflagset(6)) {
force_rtp_proxy();
};
# NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example,
# re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as
# NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies
t_on_reply("1");
# send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably
# even for UDP2TCP
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
# !! Nathelper
onreply_route[1] {
# NATed transaction ?
if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") {
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy();
# otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not
# know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts)
} else if (nat_uac_test("1")) {
fix_nated_contact();
};
}
And the last few lines of debug
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10795]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (7):
uri
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10797]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (-4):
usrloc
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10774]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (0):
usrloc
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10794]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (6):
uri
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10796]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (8):
usrloc
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10793]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (5):
group
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10792]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1):
auth_db
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10795]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (7):
group
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10797]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (-4):
uri
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10774]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (0):
uri
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10794]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (6):
group
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10796]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (8):
uri
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10793]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (5):
auth_db
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10792]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1):
nathelper
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10795]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (7):
auth_db
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10797]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (-4):
group
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10774]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (0):
group
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10794]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (6):
auth_db
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10796]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (8):
group
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10793]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (5):
nathelper
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10792]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found,
support for it enabled
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10795]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (7):
nathelper
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10797]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (-4):
auth_db
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10774]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (0):
auth_db
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10794]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (6):
nathelper
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10796]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (8):
auth_db
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10793]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found,
support for it enabled
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10795]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found,
support for it enabled
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10797]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (-4):
nathelper
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10774]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (0):
nathelper
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10794]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found,
support for it enabled
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10796]: DEBUG: init_mod_child (8):
nathelper
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10797]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found,
support for it enabled
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10774]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found,
support for it enabled
Dec 10 11:36:24 ns1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[10796]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found,
support for it enabled
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20041210/c30043e5/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list