[Serusers] trouble with t_on_failure [sorry, webmail failure....]
ser
ser at plexid.com
Fri Aug 20 22:15:27 CEST 2004
Hi,
i use an exec_dst in a failure_route in ser 0.8.12
I have very strange behaviour.
Are there known bug using exec_dst in a failure_route ?
Could you give me exemple of good syntax to use the result of an exec_dst in a failure_route.
The goal is in fact to forward on call in another location if a user is busy or don't answer.
thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20040820/3edde440/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list