[Serusers] trouble with t_on_failure [sorry, webmail failure....]

ser ser at plexid.com
Fri Aug 20 22:15:27 CEST 2004


Hi,

i use an exec_dst in a failure_route in ser 0.8.12

I have very strange behaviour.

Are there known bug using exec_dst in a failure_route ?

Could you give me exemple of good syntax to use the result of an exec_dst in a failure_route.

The goal is in fact to forward on call in another location if a user is busy or don't answer.

 

thanks.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20040820/3edde440/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list