[Serusers] has any body got success with ser-0.8.12 with cpl-c module
ser die
serdiehard at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 4 07:12:28 CEST 2004
thanks richard
iam using the
version: ser 0.8.12-1rc6 (i386/linux)
and i compiled it with cpl-c module and its not
giveing
any problem while ser startup
and i have this scenario
A B C
101 -->216110 --> 54110 ->
i.e when A calls B by cpl it has to redirect to C
and i have inserted in the ser database with cpl table
looks like this
******************************************************
mysql> select * from cpl;
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------+
| user | cpl_xml
| cpl_bin |
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------+
| 216110 | <?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE cpl PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD RFCxxxx CPL1.0//EN"
"cpl-06.dtd">
<cpl>
<incoming>
<location url="sip:54110 at server.pol.net.in">
<redirect />
</location>
</incoming>
</cpl>
| |
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
*******************************************************
but it is directly going to the B it self not
redirecting to the C
A,B and C are all registered to the server
so iam attaching my ser.cfg below
*************************************************
# ----------- global configuration parameters
------------------------
debug=8 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E)
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
port=5060
children=4
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
fifo_mode=438
# ------------------ module loading
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/exec.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/domain.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/cpl-c.so"
# Uncomment this if you want digest authentication
# mysql.so must be loaded !
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so"
# !! Nathelper
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters
# -- usrloc params --
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
# for persistent storage and comment the previous line
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
# -- auth params --
# Uncomment if you are using auth module
#
modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
#
# If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which
true in this config),
# uncomment also the following parameter)
#
modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
modparam("usrloc","db_url","mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "db_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 2)
modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "miocfst")
modparam("acc", "failed_transactions" ,1)
# -- rr params --
# add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
#cpl
modparam("cpl-c","cpl_dtd_file","/usr/local/etc/ser/cpl-06.dtd")
modparam("cpl-c","cpl_db","mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
modparam("cpl-c","cpl_table","cpl")
# !! Nathelper
modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping
interval 30 s
modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping
only clients behind NAT
# ------------------------- request routing logic
-------------------
# main routing logic
route{
# initial sanity checks -- messages with
# max_forwards==0, or excessively long
requests
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (msg:len >= max_len ) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too
big");
break;
};
# !! Nathelper
# Special handling for NATed clients; first,
NAT test is
# executed: it looks for via!=received and
RFC1918 addresses
# in Contact (may fail if line-folding is
used); also,
# the received test should, if completed,
should check all
# vias for rpesence of received
if (nat_uac_test("3")) {
# Allow RR-ed requests, as these may
indicate that
# a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of
it; unless it is
# a REGISTER
if (method == "REGISTER" || !
search("^Record-Route:")) {
log("LOG: Someone trying to
register from private IP, rewriting\n");
# This will work only for user
agents that support symmetric
# communication. We tested quite
many of them and majority is
# smart enough to be symmetric. In
some phones it takes a configuration
# option. With Cisco 7960, it is
called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is
# called "symmetric media" and
"symmetric signalling".
fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite
contact with source IP of signalling
if (method == "INVITE") {
fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add
direction=active to SDP
};
force_rport(); # Add rport
parameter to topmost Via
setflag(6); # Mark as NATed
};
};
setflag(1);
setflag(2);
# we record-route all messages -- to make sure
that
# subsequent messages will go through our
proxy; that's
# particularly good if upstream and downstream
entities
# use different transport protocol
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should
take the
# path determined by record-routing
if (loose_route()) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
if (!uri==myself) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
if (uri==myself)
{
if
(method=="REGISTER")
{
if
(!www_authorize("server.pol.net.in", "subscriber")) {
www_challenge("server.pol.net.in", "0");
break;
};
cpl_process_register();
save("location");
break;
};
lookup("aliases");
if (!uri==myself) {
append_hf("P-hint: outbound
alias\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
# native SIP destinations are handled
using our USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not
Found");
break;
};
};
append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
route(1);
}
route[1]
{
# !! Nathelper
if
(uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)"
&& !search("^Route:")){
sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to
private IP addresses");
break;
};
# if client or server know to be behind a NAT,
enable relay
if (isflagset(6)) {
force_rtp_proxy();
};
# NAT processing of replies; apply to all
transactions (for example,
# re-INVITEs from public to private UA are
hard to identify as
# NATed at the moment of request processing);
look at replies
t_on_reply("1");
# send it out now; use stateful forwarding as
it works reliably
# even for UDP2TCP
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
# !! Nathelper
onreply_route[1] {
# NATed transaction ?
if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]")
{
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy();
# otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and
we did not
# know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918
contacts)
} else if (nat_uac_test("1")) {
fix_nated_contact();
};
}
****************************************************
so do i need to add still any statement to this
please guide me
with regards
serdiehard
--- Richard <mypop3mail at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Why not use the cvs version? I have cvs with cpl-c
> and
> it works fine.
>
> If it is throughly tested by yourself, it is not
> much
> less stable than the release version.
>
> --- ser die <serdiehard at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > hello friends,
> >
> > iam spending too much time
> >
> > if any body got this
> >
> > please help me
> >
> > with regards
> > serdiehard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We
> > finish.
> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
More information about the sr-users
mailing list