[Serusers] nathelper fix_nated_* question
Andy Pyles
apyles at wilds.homeunix.com
Thu Apr 22 17:07:28 CEST 2004
Hi Maxim,
so just to be clear, bridge mode needs to be enabled on the command line
for rtpproxy correct?
Is -l the option for bridge mode?
i.e.: `rtpproxy -l 192.168.0.1/1.2.3.4'
Andy
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Looks like what you really want is rtpproxy/nathelper in bridge mode.
> Please check sample configuration files available in the trunk as well
> as comments at the beginning of nathelper.c.
>
> -Maxim
>
> Andy Pyles wrote:
> > In the overly simplified version below, assuming I have 2 ip's:
> >
> > 192.168.0.1 , and 1.2.3.4 How do I specify which IP will be replaced?
> >
> > In this particular case I want it to always replace with 1.2.3.4 on
> > packets
> > going out, and 192.168.0.1 on the way in. From my example it's always
> > replacing it with the internal ip.
> >
> > For example the following would be nice:
> > EIP=1.2.3.4
> > IIP=192.168.0.1
> >
> > fix_nated_contact(EIP);
> > fix_nated_sdp(EIP);
> > etc.
> >
> >
> > if (method == "INVITE") {
> >
> > fix_nated_contact();
> > fix_nated_sdp("3")
> > if (force_rtp_proxy("FAEE"))
> > t_on_reply("1");
> >
> > }
> >
> > onreply_route[1] {
> > if (!(status=~"183" || status=~"200"))
> > break;
> > fix_nated_contact();
> > fix_nated_sdp("3");
> > force_rtp_proxy("FA");
> > }
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list