[Serusers] nat and rtpproxy/mediaproxy

[Klaus Darilion]

Hi Richard!

I'm testing only the source address of the incoming request. If it's the 
same as in the topmost via header, the client is public or supports 
STUN. If it's different (no STUN support or behind symmetric NAT), the 
client will be marked as NATed and nat_ping and rtpproxy will be enforced.

klaus

Richard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I looked at the archieve and tried to find a solution
> for natted clients in a carrier environment. I have to
> say I am clear as mud. In our senario, some clients
> are behind nat, while others are not. Clients may move
> between nat and no-nat. What's the best approach to
> rtpproxy/mediaproxy. In rtpproxy's readme, it uses
> "search" to find certain client. It has issues to
> support other clients. Is nat_uac_test/client_nat_test
> sufficient to test either src or dest is behind nat
> and should go through media proxy? What if some
> clients have stun support? What if some are behind
> symmetric NAT and some are not?
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 		
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢
> http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
>