[Serusers] RE: [Serdev] Rmoving to-tags

Jason Penton j.penton at ru.ac.za
Fri Apr 2 09:02:11 CEST 2004


Hi Jiri

Thanks for the advice - it works perfectly now. I must say that out of the
many Uas I have played with - more of them screw the tags up than less.

Thanks again for the help.

Cheers
Jason 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri at iptel.org] 
> Sent: 01 April 2004 05:50 PM
> To: Jason Penton
> Subject: RE: [Serdev] Rmoving to-tags
> 
> At 09:22 AM 4/1/2004, Jason Penton wrote:
> 
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri at iptel.org]
> >> Sent: 01 April 2004 09:17 AM
> >> To: Jason Penton
> >> Subject: RE: [Serdev] Rmoving to-tags
> >> 
> >> At 09:10 AM 4/1/2004, Jason Penton wrote:
> >> >Hi Jiri
> >> >
> >> >Yes - I have. BUT I was under the impression that the 180 RINGING 
> >> >response is not REQUIRED to have a to-tag i.e. to set up an
> >> early dialog.
> >> >
> >> >Is this understanding correct?
> >> 
> >> indeed, to-tags serve the purpose if establishing a dialog. 
> >> 180 does not establish any, only 183 does.
> >
> >So then to fix the problem I am having - I could 
> theoretically remove 
> >the to-tags from all incoming 180 RINGING responses before 
> forwarding 
> >them to the UAC and my problem should be solved.
> 
> you could, but it sounds to me like a too terrible hack.
> 
> >Now my second quesiton is where in
> >the SER code can I do this (first assumption is in the tm module 
> >??????)
> 
> now, message mangling is done in textops. You need to set up 
> stateful processing (t_on_reply), process replies, look at 
> which you wish to mangle and eventually mangle them.
> 
> -jiri 
> 
> 
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list