[Serusers] SER Comment

[Andres]

On Sunday 14 September 2003 10:16, Greg Fausak wrote:
> Andres,
>
> We have the same results as you.
> SER is a great proxy server.  It just keeps
> on running and running...
>
> I haven't tried the rtpproxy.  Is that a Jasomi
> like function?
It sure is.  Works perfect with our installed base of ATA186 and Grandstream 
phones.  Most GS phones don't need it because of their use of STUN, but we 
have a few behind Symmetric NATs which break the STUN protocol and need the 
rtpproxy.

Regards,
Andres

>
> ---greg
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to take this oportunity to say that SER is Fantastic!
> >
> > We have been using it to power our SIP Services for over 5
> > months now (Version
> > 0.8.10 and 0.8.11 now).  We have been really surprised by its
> > stability and
> > effectiveness.  It has never ever crashed and it has
> > processed tens of
> > thousands of calls for us.  Thanks to Jiri, Jan, Andrei and all other
> > developers that made this possible.
> >
> > The nathelper/rtpproxy module developed by Maxim has also
> > enabled us to reach
> > customers we were unable to before.  We are happy to report
> > that in the 2
> > months we have used the new rtpproxy module, it has worked
> > flawlessly.
> >
> > I just wish other software were this stable.  Asterisk for
> > one seems to crash
> > pretty often on us, but when its up, it works great too.
> >
> > Thanks Again and best regards.
> > Andres
> > http://www.telesip.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers