[Serusers] Accounting and parallel/sequential forking

Guilherme Dal Pizzol gpizzol at telenova.net
Thu Sep 4 00:02:42 CEST 2003


ello,

I'm trying to generate call accounting in parallel and sequential forking,
but I think I'm missing something.

My ser.cfg is attached.

When I perform a call (parallel fork / sequential fork) I'm getting only
one miss report, for example:

1 - SER receives a INVITE
2 - INVITE is sent to A and B (parallel)
3 - A fails with 503
4 - B fails with 408 (TM generates 408)

5 - SER logs only 408!!! How about 503? Is there any way to account both
misses?

6 - As both calls failed, SER will continue with failure_route[1]
(sequential) that also fails with 408!!
7 - No account is generated!

8 - As the last call failed (failure_route[1]), it will continue with
failure_route[2] (sequential), that also fails with 408!!
9 - At this point, SER will account the last failure only if
failed_transactions is set to "1". Is this the correct behaviour?

Thanks in advance.

Guilherme.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ser.cfg
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3254 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20030903/fb9327ff/attachment.obj>


More information about the sr-users mailing list