[Serusers] partially restrict access

[Daniel Medina]

 The message dumps seem to indicate that the Cisco gateway is sending, 
as you say, messages to the proxy server with only one via header field 
in it.

 The messages are

	SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
	SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP

Should ser be seeing these as errors?  I thought they were part of the 
RFC.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 03:23:51AM +0100, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
> >  The logs say
> >
> >ERROR: forward_msg: no 2nd via found in reply 
> > (repeated a few times)
> >Outside line 
> > (Indicating that the caller actually passed)
> >route[2]:SIP-to-PSTN call routed
> >ERROR: reply cannot be parsed
> 
> Well, unless I see message dumps I assume that it happens what your
> log tell: someone sends a reply to proxy server with only one via
> header field in it, or other defect. (Other situatation when this may
> happen is when SER acts as a UAC, like if it generates local CANCELs,
> and replies come back after the transaction state is already gone.)
> 
> 
> -jiri  

-- 
Dan