[Serusers] SER is not matching ACK Messages

Ricardo Villa ricvil at epm.net.co
Mon May 26 16:49:57 CEST 2003


Hi Jiri,

Could you explain how to "use RFC-3261 transaction matching".  Is this
something I can switch on in the ser.cfg?

Thanks,
Ricardo

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jiri Kuthan" <jiri at iptel.org>
To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>; "Ricardo Villa" <ricvil at epm.net.co>;
<aolchik at telenova.net>
Cc: "List serusers" <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER is not matching ACK Messages


> At 11:57 PM 5/25/2003, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> >Ok i first overlooked a problem in the messages.
> >I think the ATA is guilty because the request URI of the ACK is not the
same
> >as the URI from the INVITE. And if i'm not wrong the URIs has to be the
same
> >because the ACK for a negative reply belongs to the transaction.
>
> Thanks Nils -- indeed, that's an ATA bug -- the URIs must be the same.
>
> To fix the problem, I urge ATA users to urge Cisco. You can use some
workarounds
> (like disabling tm "ruri_matching" tm parameter in the about to be
released
> ser 0.8.11 version) but ATA is the primary place to fix. Actually, the
best
> thing to do with ATA is to use RFC-3261 transaction matching -- 2541
matching
> has been obsoleted quite a while ago.
>
> -jiri
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>





More information about the sr-users mailing list