[Serusers] pstn gateway survey

Ricardo Villa ricvil at epm.net.co
Mon Mar 31 20:59:15 CEST 2003


Hi Greg,

Can you share with us which "hardware" endpoints you have tested
successfully with SER?  As for my part I have tested:

1.  ATA186
2.  Nortel Networks i2004 phone (controlled by software SIP client)

Both have worked quite well and interoperate with each other without issues.

Regards,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Fausak" <lgfausak at august.net>
To: <boman122 at yahoo.com>; <ricvil at epm.net.co>; <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] pstn gateway survey


> Endpoint works.
>
> It is a very important point.  I've tested perhaps 8 endpoints
> and only have 3 that 'work' with my Cisco/Iptel gear.
>
> ---greg
>
> >
> >Yes, you are right. Maybe we can call it Endpoint instead of Gateway.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Ricardo Villa" <ricvil at epm.net.co>
> >To: "Bo" <boman122 at yahoo.com>; <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> >Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 1:37 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Serusers] pstn gateway survey
> >
> >
> >> How can the ATA186 be a PSTN gateway?  It does not have FXO ports.
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Bo" <boman122 at yahoo.com>
> >> To: "Emil" <emil at mkc.co.za>; <serusers at lists.iptel.org>; "Jiri Kuthan"
> >> <jiri at iptel.org>
> >> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 12:40 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Serusers] pstn gateway survey
> >>
> >>
> >> > Cisco AS5300
> >> > Cisco AS5400
> >> > Cisco ATA186
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Emil" <emil at mkc.co.za>
> >> > To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>; "Jiri Kuthan" <jiri at iptel.org>
> >> > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:35 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] pstn gateway survey
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > Cisco VG200
> >> > > Cisco 2600
> >> > >
> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > From: "Jiri Kuthan" <jiri at iptel.org>
> >> > > To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> >> > > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:01 AM
> >> > > Subject: [Serusers] pstn gateway survey
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > Friends,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > please, can you help me and share with me privately which
SIP2PSTN
> >> > > > gateways you are using in your networks? I'ld like to get a
better
> >> > > > feeling of what devices today have reputation of being usable and
> >> > > > with which of them SER has been tested. I'm interested in
all-grade
> >> > > > devices, from single FXO to SS7 gateways. I'll keep it for
myself.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thank you a lot,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -Jiri
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > Serusers mailing list
> >> > > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > Serusers mailing list
> >> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Serusers mailing list
> >> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Serusers mailing list
> >> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>




More information about the sr-users mailing list