[Serusers] OPTIONS method

Jan Janak jan at iptel.org
Tue Mar 11 12:27:20 CET 2003


Hello Greg,

If the OPTIONS request is targeted to the other UA involved in the
conversation, then the proxy should simply forward the request there and
the other UA is supposed to send a reply.

Jan.

On 10-03 22:04, Greg Fausak wrote:
> What, if anything, should the SER server do with a
> OPTIONS method?  
> 
> I am receiving this method, from a phone, right after the
> phone makes a conversation.  That is, the final ACK is
> sent from the phone and a call is in progress when the phone decides
> to send an OPTIONS message.  I thought OPTIONS was a pre-call
> sort of thing, not for the current call.
> 
> Anyway, I thought I could just capture the OPTIONS method and send
> a 486 busy reply with sl_send_reply().  Didn't work.
> 
> ---greg
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20030311/5b0b1f7d/attachment.pgp>


More information about the sr-users mailing list