[Serusers] Ignored registrations?
jiri at iptel.org
Wed Jul 2 19:40:21 CEST 2003
quick guess -- configure your SIP telephones to use address of your SIP server
as opposed to SIP000BBEF2DF4C.
At 06:23 PM 7/2/2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>I'm having a small problem with a phone registration at a customer's
>site. The majority of the phones register with no problem. The ones
>that register correctly are Snom 200s, while the one I'm having problems
>with is a Cisco. The registration request I see in my ngrep log from
>the Cisco is:
> REGISTER sip:SIP000BBEF2DF4C SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 172.21.20.200:5060.. From: sip:Line1 at SIP000BBEF2DF4C..To:
> sip:Line1 at SIP000BBEF2DF4C..Call-ID:
> 000bbef2-df4c000c-223725a3-671cea85 at 172.21.20.200..CSeq: 101
> REGISTER..Contact: <sip:Line1 at 172.21.20.200:5060>..Expires:
> 3600..Content-Length: 0....
>While a Snom's request looks like this:
> REGISTER sip:172.21.30.50 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 70..From: "IC36" <sip:IC36 at 172.21.30.50>;tag=26kqteejq4..To: "IC36"
> <sip:IC36 at 172.21.30.50>..Call-ID:
> 3ef763ebf18c-ga88nc7dymyf at 172.21.20.36..User-Agent:
> snom200-1.15r..CSeq: 1581 REGISTER..Route:
> <sip:IC36 at 172.21.20.36:5060;line=1>..Expires: 600..Content-Length:
>There's never a response of any kind from the SER proxy to the Cisco's
>request. I noticed that the Cisco doesn't enlcose the From or To
>addresses in <>'s, while the Snom and other SIP devices at the location
>do, but I'm not sure that's the problem.
>Jamin W. Collins
>This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
>of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
More information about the sr-users