[Serusers] Progress on *BSD Platforms

Maxim Sobolev sobomax at portaone.com
Thu Jan 30 14:17:32 CET 2003


John Todd wrote:
> 
> >I also have found myself moving over to Free- and OpenBSD for most
> >workstation and server needs, but I keep an install of Mandrake handy
> >for those few apps that don't port to well over to the BSD platforms.
> >What I'm really interested in is stund support in OpenBSD that
> >integrated w/ pf, seeing as how the majority of my firewalls are now
> >OpenBSD 3.1-3.2 boxes running the new pf code.  Ser itself runs great on
> >FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE, which is what I use as my testing platform, but
> >this NAT stuff is really killing me when it comes to bringing in
> >potential callers over the WAN.  Any word on when a *BSD-compatible
> >binary of stund might be available?  Thanks.
> >
> >--
> >Art Mason CCNA
> >Network Consultant
> >Maverick Datacom
> >E-mail: amason at maverickdatacom.com
> 
> You're in the same boat as I am.  I'm already on OpenBSD, and
> kludging the NAT workarounds really is uncomfortable using Linux as a
> host for running only stund.
> 
> Of course, I'd really just like Cisco's NAT re-writing to
> automatically work, since all I'm using are Cisco UA's (ATA-186.)
> They claim that if the server can send "received=" in the Via
> headers, their systems will automatically forget and re-write the
> request with the 'correct' IP address, however in practice I have not
> been able to make that work, and I have heard of nobody who is more
> clueful than I am being able to make it work, either.  (see the
> "Receiver-tagged VIA header" section in the document
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ata/atarn/186rn214.htm#xtocid17
> - note that this is for release 2.14, and I'm running 2.15, but I
> would be surprised if they removed functionality.)
> 
> I am very interested in Maxim's port of stund to FreeBSD, though.  I
> could not get it working using the stund I found on Vovida's page
> (http://www.vovida.org/downloads/stun/stund_0.7.tgz) and the patch
> failed.  Patching by hand did not solve the makefile problems.
> Before I invest any more time: is this the right source to be
> patching against?

You can get the right version here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sobomax/stund_0.8.2.tgz.

-Maxim



More information about the sr-users mailing list