[Serusers] Unformatted Exerpts from for BYE problem

Thu Dec 18 21:31:55 CET 2003

SIP/2.0 200 OK

To: <sip:8646783182 at 63.86.212.154>;tag=bc5a80577e3d5642

From: <sip:8644679887 at 63.86.212.157>;tag=322BCA98-25A3

Call-ID: F429FDCE-30B011D8-BA0EDB9C-52307829 at 63.86.212.157

CSeq: 101 INVITE

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 63.86.212.154;branch=z9hG4bKb2f4.035.0

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 63.86.212.157:5060

Record-Route: <sip:8646783182 at 63.86.212.154;ftag=322BCA98-25A3;lr>

Timestamp: 1071766157

Contact: John Walter <sip:8646783182 at 63.86.212.155:5060>

Server: Sipura/SPA2000-1.0.20

Content-Length: 150

Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, PRACK, REFER

Supported: 100rel

Content-Type: application/sdp

v=0

o=- 88599 88599 IN IP4 192.168.0.101

s=-

c=IN IP4 63.86.212.155

t=0 0

m=audio 16404 RTP/AVP 0

a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000

a=ptime:20

a=sendrecv

?Úá?ÉF&#0;ó&#0;&#0;ó&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;ªûì&#0;

^N&#0;Eå"8@&#0;þÁ?VÔsÀ¨&#0;eÄÄÑBEACK
sip:8646783182 at 63.86.212.155:5060 SIP/2.0

Record-Route: <sip:8646783182 at 63.86.212.154;ftag=322BCA98-25A3;lr>

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 63.86.212.154;branch=0

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 63.86.212.157:5060

From: <sip:8644679887 at 63.86.212.157>;tag=322BCA98-25A3

To: <sip:8646783182 at 63.86.212.154>;tag=bc5a80577e3d5642

Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:49:17 GMT

Call-ID: F429FDCE-30B011D8-BA0EDB9C-52307829 at 63.86.212.157

Max-Forwards: 5

Content-Length: 0

CSeq: 101 ACK

À¨&#0;e?VÔsÄÄ·á}BYE sip:8644679887 at 63.86.212.157:5060 SIP/2.0

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 63.86.212.155:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-b76fe29f

From: <sip:8646783182 at 63.86.212.154>;tag=bc5a80577e3d5642

To: <sip:8644679887 at 63.86.212.157>;tag=322BCA98-25A3

Call-ID: F429FDCE-30B011D8-BA0EDB9C-52307829 at 63.86.212.157

CSeq: 101 BYE

Max-Forwards: 70

Route: <sip:8646783182 at 63.86.212.154;ftag=322BCA98-25A3;lr>

User-Agent: Sipura/SPA2000-1.0.20

Content-Length: 0

Úá?&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;&#0;ªûì&#0;

^N&#0;E":@&#0;þ%?VÔsÀ¨&#0;eÄÄkè¯SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does
Not Exist

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 63.86.212.155:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-b76fe29f

From: <sip:8646783182 at 63.86.212.154>;tag=bc5a80577e3d5642

To: <sip:8644679887 at 63.86.212.157>;tag=322BCA98-25A3

Call-ID: F429FDCE-30B011D8-BA0EDB9C-52307829 at 63.86.212.157

CSeq: 101 BYE

Contact: <sip:8644679887 at 63.86.212.148>

Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.12 (i386/linux))

Content-Length: 0

Warning: 392 63.86.212.148:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=20033
req_src_ip=63.86.212.154 req_src_port=5060
in_uri=sip:8644679887 at 63.86.212.148:5060
out_uri=sip:8644679887 at 63.86.212.148:5060 via_cnt==0"


-----Original Message-----
From: Andres [ mailto:andres at telesip.net <mailto:andres at telesip.net> ]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Darren Sessions; serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] BYE Message Problem


On Thursday 18 December 2003 15:11, Darren Sessions wrote:
> Sipura Firmware is 1.0.20
>
> We are already in talks with Sipura about this issue as we found a bug for
> them yesterday. It appears though based on the Etheral traces and ngrep
> that the Sipura is sending the BYE messages - but SER is not forwarding
> them along.
Can you post all the messages here(INVITE...to ...BYE)?  Otherwise it is
hard
to guess where the problem might be.  I'm sure Jiri or Jan can spot the
error
right away. 

>
> We are using Ser 8.12 on a Sun Ultra 60 - and as I said before, all other
> instances work flawlessly.
>
> Thanks,
>
>  - Darren
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andres [ mailto:andres at telesip.net <mailto:andres at telesip.net> ]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:58 PM
> To: Darren Sessions; serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] BYE Message Problem
>
> On Thursday 18 December 2003 14:50, Darren Sessions wrote:
> > We also have a problem with BYE's not being sent from an on-net call
> > (sipura to sipura).
>
> What firmware version are you using?  We have been testing the SPA2000 for
> about 3 weeks now and have not seen this issue.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Darren Sessions
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:32 PM
> > To: 'serusers at lists.iptel.org'
> > Subject: RE: Serusers Digest, Vol 8, Issue 16
> > Importance: High
> >
> >
> > Situation:
> >
> > Endpoint is called Party (Sipura SPA2000)
> >
> > Calling Party is routed through from a TDM call and VoIP'd by Cisco 3640
> > router then sent to SER.
> >
> > Endpoint receives call - everything works. When the Sipura hangs up the
> > call, it sends a BYE to ser - but ser does not send the BYE to the
router
> > to disconnect the TDM channel.
> >
> > All other situations result in a completed call with channels released
on
> > the router just fine.
> >
> > After further inspection - we noticed that when the Sipura hangs up and
> > send the BYE to SER, SER responds with this:
> >
> >
> > SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 11.11.111.155:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-b76fe29f
> > From: <sip:8646783182 at 22.22.222.154>;tag=bc5a80577e3d5642
> > To: <sip:8644679887 at 33.33.333.157>;tag=322BCA98-25A3
> > Call-ID: F429FDCE-30B011D8-BA0EDB9C-52307829 at 33.33.333.157
> > CSeq: 101 BYE
> > Contact: <sip:8644679887 at 44.44.444.148>
> > Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.12 (i386/linux))
> > Content-Length: 0
> > Warning: 392 44.44.444.148:5060 "Noisy feedback tells:  pid=20033
> > req_src_ip=22.22.222.154 req_src_port=5060
> > in_uri=sip:8644679887 at 44.44.444.148:5060
> > out_uri=sip:8644679887 at 44.44.444.148:5060 via_cnt==0"
> >
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >  - Darren
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
<http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20031218/0b13a2ff/attachment.htm>