[Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
TeleSIP
ricvil at telesip.net
Thu Dec 4 17:01:50 CET 2003
I see a problem with your "status" line.
It sould be:
if (status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]")
not
if (status=~"[0-9][0-9]")
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil at telesip.net>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> Hmm.. I'm having a hard time getting it to work.. Here is the
configuration
> I've got on my ser box.
>
> #
> # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21 2003/06/04 13:47:36 jiri Exp $
> #
> # simple quick-start config script
> #
> # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
> debug=7 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
> fork=yes
> #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E)
>
> /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode
> debug=7
> fork=no
> log_stderror=yes
> */
>
> check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
> dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
> rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
> port=5060
> children=4
> fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
>
> alias=acme.dom
>
> # ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
>
>
> loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
>
>
> # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
> # -- usrloc params --
> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
>
>
> # -- rr params --
> # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
> modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
>
> # ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
>
> # main routing logic
>
> route{
>
> # initial sanity checks -- messages with
> # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
>
> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
> break;
> };
>
> if ( msg:len > max_len ) {
> sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
> break;
> };
>
> # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
> # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
> # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
> # use different transport protocol
>
> record_route();
>
> # loose-route processing
>
> if (loose_route()) {
> t_relay();
> break;
> };
>
> # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc
> # (in case, it does not work, use the following command
> # with proper names and addresses in it)
>
> if (uri==myself) {
> if (method=="REGISTER") {
> save("location");
> break;
> };
>
> # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB
>
> if (!lookup("location")) {
> sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
> break;
> };
> };
>
> #inserted by klaus
>
> if (method=="INVITE") {
> record_route();
> fix_nated_contact();
> force_rtp_proxy();
> t_on_reply("1");
> };
>
> # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that
> # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP
>
> if (!t_relay()) {
> sl_reply_error();
> };
>
> }
>
> #inserted by klaus
> # all incoming replies for t_onrepli-ed transactions enter here
>
> onreply_route[1] {
> if (status=~"[0-9][0-9]")
> fix_nated_contact();
> force_rtp_proxy();
> }
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil at telesip.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:15 PM
> To: Darren Sessions
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> No...All you need to do is to compile it and the run it.
>
> Regards,
> Andres
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
> To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil at telesip.net>
> Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 3:39 PM
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> >
> > Do I need to do anything special with rtpproxy?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil at telesip.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:44 PM
> > To: Darren Sessions
> > Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > Take a loot at the nathelper_rtp.cfg file under the modules/nathelper
> > directory. It contains the basics of what you need.
> >
> > The funcionality is basically determined by these lines:
> >
> > if (method=="INVITE") {
> > record_route();
> > if (isflagset(1)) { # ATA ?
> > force_rtp_proxy();
> > };
> > /* set up reply processing */
> > t_on_reply("1");
> > };
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > onreply_route[1] {
> > if (status=~"1[0-9][0-9]" && search("Server: Cisco ATA.*"))
> > fix_nated_contact();
> > force_rtp_proxy();
> > }
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
> > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil at telesip.net>
> > Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:20 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > > Hmmm.. You wouldn't by chance have a "scrubbed" version of your
> > > configuration file I could look at would you? It would be most
helpful.
> > >
> > > Thanks for everything,
> > >
> > > - Darren
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil at telesip.net]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:18 PM
> > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > >
> > >
> > > We have nathelper/rtpproxy/SER all on the same server. The ser.cfg
must
> > be
> > > configured to invoke the nathelper/rtproxy functions as needed.
> > >
> > > I cannot comment on SEMS since we don't use it.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
> > > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil at telesip.net>
> > > Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:11 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > >
> > >
> > > > My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to
the
> > > > nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints
> to
> > > the
> > > > primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)?
> > Does
> > > > the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the
> > > > signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper
> box?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a ton for all the help!
> > > >
> > > > - Darren
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil at telesip.net]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM
> > > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > > Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months
> on
> > > our
> > > > production servers and it has never crashed
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
> > > > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil at telesip.net>
> > > > Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll let you know how it goes..
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil at telesip.net]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM
> > > > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > > > Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Darren,
> > > > >
> > > > > 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also
> put
> > > > some
> > > > > time into it but I was never able to get it to compile. If you
have
> > > > better
> > > > > luck please let us all know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Andres.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
> > > > > To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul"
<pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> > > > > Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM
> > > > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t
with
> > > > Solaris
> > > > > 9.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all
> > > > > > cc -o main.o -c main.c
> > > > > > In file included from main.c:45:
> > > > > > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
> > > > > > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory
> > > > > > main.c: In function `main':
> > > > > > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len'
> > > > > > make: *** [main.o] Error 1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the
> > > > > Makefile.gnu
> > > > > > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for
Solaris".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any help would be appreciated! :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Darren
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
> > > > > > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de]
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM
> > > > > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > > > > Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions
> <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for
> > > > Nathelper
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network
> > cards?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so
> they
> > > must
> > > > > > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface
(to
> > > avoid
> > > > > > packets with different source address than the destination of
the
> > > > intial
> > > > > > packet going back to the nat).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >then
> > > > > > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call
routing?
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > > > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andrei
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Serusers mailing list
> > > > > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
More information about the sr-users
mailing list