[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] NATS Module not working (Issue #3253)
iliesh
notifications at github.com
Thu Sep 29 14:05:47 CEST 2022
Hi @linuxmaniac,
```
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo at entry=6, no_tid=no_tid at entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44
44 return INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (ret) ? INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (ret) : 0;
(gdb) bt
#0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo at entry=6, no_tid=no_tid at entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44
#1 0x00007efc5586f5b3 in __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=<optimized out>) at pthread_kill.c:78
#2 0x00007efc55822ce6 in __GI_raise (sig=sig at entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26
#3 0x00007efc557f67f3 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#4 0x00000000006fbc43 in qm_debug_check_frag (qm=0x7efc4ff87000, f=0x7efc50068e90, file=0x7efc4ff5e688 "nats: nats_mod.c", line=593, efile=0x882eb9 "core/mem/q_malloc.c", eline=511)
at core/mem/q_malloc.c:129
#5 0x00000000006ffe6b in qm_free (qmp=0x7efc4ff87000, p=0x7efc50068ec8, file=0x7efc4ff5e688 "nats: nats_mod.c", func=0x7efc4ff5f360 <__func__.13> "nats_destroy_workers", line=593,
mname=0x7efc4ff5e000 "nats") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:511
#6 0x000000000070a971 in qm_shm_free (qmp=0x7efc4ff87000, p=0x7efc50068ec8, file=0x7efc4ff5e688 "nats: nats_mod.c", func=0x7efc4ff5f360 <__func__.13> "nats_destroy_workers", line=593,
mname=0x7efc4ff5e000 "nats") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:1350
#7 0x00007efc4ff58d89 in nats_destroy_workers () at nats_mod.c:593
#8 0x00007efc4ff58dce in mod_destroy () at nats_mod.c:604
#9 0x0000000000636b22 in destroy_modules () at core/sr_module.c:842
#10 0x000000000041f059 in cleanup (show_status=0) at main.c:561
#11 0x0000000000420ac1 in shutdown_children (sig=15, show_status=0) at main.c:704
#12 0x0000000000439a81 in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fff506497d8) at main.c:3093
```
```
#0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo at entry=6, no_tid=no_tid at entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44
tid = <optimized out>
ret = 0
pd = <optimized out>
old_mask = {__val = {3255307778118664515, 3478467806582802989, 10, 132380695343104, 0, 0, 0, 0, 296, 301, 10, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}}
ret = <optimized out>
#1 0x00007efc5586f5b3 in __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=<optimized out>) at pthread_kill.c:78
No locals.
#2 0x00007efc55822ce6 in __GI_raise (sig=sig at entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26
ret = <optimized out>
#3 0x00007efc557f67f3 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
save_stage = 1
act = {__sigaction_handler = {sa_handler = 0x1a1a1a1a1a1a1a1a, sa_sigaction = 0x1a1a1a1a1a1a1a1a}, sa_mask = {__val = {1880844493789993498, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2314885530818453536,
2314885530818453536, 2314885530818453536, 2314885530818453536, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9016478961296, 270582939648, 0}}, sa_flags = 0, sa_restorer = 0x829484}
sigs = {__val = {32, 13816973012072644543, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4702111234474983745, 4702111234474983745, 4702111234474983745, 4702111234474983745, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1880844493789993498,
1880844493789993498}}
#4 0x00000000006fbc43 in qm_debug_check_frag (qm=0x7efc4ff87000, f=0x7efc50068e90, file=0x7efc4ff5e688 "nats: nats_mod.c", line=593, efile=0x882eb9 "core/mem/q_malloc.c", eline=511)
at core/mem/q_malloc.c:129
p = 0x501000001ff
__func__ = "qm_debug_check_frag"
#5 0x00000000006ffe6b in qm_free (qmp=0x7efc4ff87000, p=0x7efc50068ec8, file=0x7efc4ff5e688 "nats: nats_mod.c", func=0x7efc4ff5f360 <__func__.13> "nats_destroy_workers", line=593,
mname=0x7efc4ff5e000 "nats") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:511
qm = 0x7efc4ff87000
f = 0x7efc50068e90
size = 140734542155520
next = 0x1
prev = 0x7efc4ffc06c8
__func__ = "qm_free"
#6 0x000000000070a971 in qm_shm_free (qmp=0x7efc4ff87000, p=0x7efc50068ec8, file=0x7efc4ff5e688 "nats: nats_mod.c", func=0x7efc4ff5f360 <__func__.13> "nats_destroy_workers", line=593,
mname=0x7efc4ff5e000 "nats") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:1350
No locals.
#7 0x00007efc4ff58d89 in nats_destroy_workers () at nats_mod.c:593
i = 1
worker = 0x7efc50068c68
pub_worker = 0x7efc50068ec8
__func__ = "nats_destroy_workers"
#8 0x00007efc4ff58dce in mod_destroy () at nats_mod.c:604
__func__ = "mod_destroy"
#9 0x0000000000636b22 in destroy_modules () at core/sr_module.c:842
t = 0x7efc5506d6a8
foo = 0x7efc5506d1d0
__func__ = "destroy_modules"
#10 0x000000000041f059 in cleanup (show_status=0) at main.c:561
memlog = 0
__func__ = "cleanup"
#11 0x0000000000420ac1 in shutdown_children (sig=15, show_status=0) at main.c:704
__func__ = "shutdown_children"
#12 0x0000000000439a81 in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fff506497d8) at main.c:3093
cfg_stream = 0xced380
--Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--
c = -1
r = 0
tmp = 0xc5 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xc5>
tmp_len = 0
port = 0
proto = 0
ahost = 0x0
aport = 0
options = 0x8152f8 ":f:cm:M:dVIhEeb:l:L:n:vKrRDTN:W:w:t:u:g:P:G:SQ:O:a:A:x:X:Y:"
ret = -1
seed = 3432664775
rfd = 4
debug_save = 0
debug_flag = 0
dont_fork_cnt = 0
n_lst = 0x300000000
p = 0x40 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x40>
st = {st_dev = 25, st_ino = 1308, st_nlink = 2, st_mode = 16832, st_uid = 1001, st_gid = 1002, __pad0 = 0, st_rdev = 0, st_size = 60, st_blksize = 4096, st_blocks = 0, st_atim = {
tv_sec = 1664442191, tv_nsec = 175708131}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 1664452599, tv_nsec = 641505726}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 1664452599, tv_nsec = 641505726}, __glibc_reserved = {0, 0, 0}}
tbuf = "⬰U\374~\000\000\070k\255U\374~\000\000P\224dP\377\177\000\000\a\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\330X\255U\374~\000\000\a\000\000\000#\000\000\000\060\272\260U\374~\000\000\225\206\256U\374~\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\200\231\256U\374~\000\000\070\340}U\374~\000\000\320=\255U\374~\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000 \224dP\377\177\000\000\360\256\260U\374~\000\000\330j\255U\374~\000\000\330j\255U\374~\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\230L\255U\374~\000\000 \224dP\377\177\000\000\220ŰU\374~\000\000\000P\255U\374~\000\000\022\\\255U\374~\000\000\066Q\256U\374~\000\000\344\003}U\374~\000\000\272\350\257"...
option_index = 0
long_options = {{name = 0x817966 "help", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 104}, {name = 0x812514 "version", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 118}, {name = 0x81796b "alias", has_arg = 1,
flag = 0x0, val = 1024}, {name = 0x817971 "subst", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1025}, {name = 0x817977 "substdef", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1026}, {
name = 0x817980 "substdefs", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1027}, {name = 0x81798a "server-id", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1028}, {name = 0x817994 "loadmodule", has_arg = 1,
flag = 0x0, val = 1029}, {name = 0x81799f "modparam", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1030}, {name = 0x8179a8 "log-engine", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1031}, {
name = 0x8179b3 "debug", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1032}, {name = 0x8179b9 "cfg-print", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 1033}, {name = 0x8179c3 "atexit", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0,
val = 1034}, {name = 0x0, has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 0}}
__func__ = "main"
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3253#issuecomment-1262182647
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3253/1262182647 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20220929/6a96605c/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list