[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] ims_ipsec_pcscf: more algorithms, SA improvements (#2731)
alexyosifov
notifications at github.com
Mon May 10 14:13:41 CEST 2021
@alexyosifov approved this pull request.
Added some comments
> @@ -846,11 +846,20 @@ int ipsec_forward(struct sip_msg* m, udomain_t* d, int _cflags)
// for Reply get the dest proto from the received request
dst_proto = req->rcv.proto;
- // for Reply and TCP sends from P-CSCF server port, for Reply and UDP sends from P-CSCF client port
- src_port = dst_proto == PROTO_TCP ? s->port_ps : s->port_pc;
+ // Check send socket
Why you have to check "send socket" here? You perform the check with zero src_port and dst_proto.
The "send socket" always is present. If you scroll down at row 877 there is the same check and if "send socket" is not present the function returns an error.
I do not see value from this change and I am not sure this will work properly.
Correct me if I am wrong.
> strcpy(l_enc_algo->alg_name,"cipher_null");
+ if (strncasecmp(r_ealg.s,"aes-cbc",r_ealg.len) == 0) {
Is it a good idea cipher algorithm to be optional? Just add a new value in _cflags parameter in int ipsec_create(struct sip_msg* m, udomain_t* d, int _cflags) method.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2731#pullrequestreview-655554158
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20210510/d3ca3046/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list