[sr-dev] rtpengine_allow_op usage doubt
David Escartin
descartin at sonoc.io
Fri Feb 5 10:46:57 CET 2021
sorry i edit the previous message
....
since version 4.4 we are using this parameter to 1 to allow that ongoing
calls process their messages through a particular rtpengine when disabling
it manually from database.
But we see that enabling it also makes all the messages select the
rtpengine and attempt to send its own op command **when an rtpengine is
disabled because the socket or host is unreachable**. This is causing an
impact in cases where the rtpengine crashes (luckily not so often).
We have been doing some tests, and with this change
....
El vie, 5 feb 2021 a las 10:43, David Escartin (<descartin at sonoc.io>)
escribió:
> Dear all
>
> since version 4.4 we are using this parameter to 1 to allow that ongoing
> calls process their messages through a particular rtpengine when disabling
> it manually from database.
> But we see that enabling it also makes all the messages select the
> rtpengine and attempt to send its own op command. This is causing an impact
> in cases where the rtpengine crashes (luckily not so often).
>
> We have been doing some tests, and with this change
>
> diff --git a/src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c
>> b/src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c
>> index 20df725d2e..2f6130c62a 100644
>> --- a/src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c
>> +++ b/src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c
>> @@ -3138,11 +3138,12 @@ select_rtpp_node(str callid, str viabranch, int
>> do_test, struct rtpp_node **quer
>> if (node->rn_recheck_ticks ==
>> RTPENGINE_MAX_RECHECK_TICKS) {
>> LM_DBG("node=%.*s for calllen=%d callid=%.*s is
>> disabled(permanent) (probably still UP)! Return it\n",
>> node->rn_url.len, node->rn_url.s,
>> callid.len, callid.len, callid.s);
>> + return node;
>> } else {
>> LM_DBG("node=%.*s for calllen=%d callid=%.*s is
>> disabled, either broke or timeout disabled! Return it\n",
>> node->rn_url.len, node->rn_url.s,
>> callid.len, callid.len, callid.s);
>> }
>> - return node;
>> + /*return node;*/
>> }
>>
>> return NULL;
>
>
> it would make to only use allow_op for manually disabled rtpengine nodes,
> and would make to not select the node and not try to send the rtpp command,
> so we would not have almost any impact in kamailio like timeouts and
> congestion, expect having messages not doing rtpengine in a call where
> others did.
>
> Do you think this change could make sense?
> Is there any reason for being like it is now?
>
> thanks a lot and regards
> david
>
> --
> [image: Logo]
>
> David Escartín Almudévar
> VoIP/Switch Engineer
> descartin at sonoc.io
>
> *SONOC*
> C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España
> Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io
>
--
[image: Logo]
David Escartín Almudévar
VoIP/Switch Engineer
descartin at sonoc.io
*SONOC*
C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España
Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20210205/5a6989dd/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list