[sr-dev] xflag losing state on serial forking

[David Escartin]

Dear all

Would you have any feedback about this query?

thanks a lot!
David Escartín

El jue, 11 feb 2021 a las 23:56, David Escartin (<descartin at sonoc.io>)
escribió:

> Hello
>
> seems with t_flush_xflags() after setxflag on failure_route, it makes it
> work. However i don't know if that should be the expected behaviour, since
> with regular transaction flags there is no need to use t_flush_flags()
>
> best regards
> david
>
> El mié, 10 feb 2021 a las 16:08, David Escartin (<descartin at sonoc.io>)
> escribió:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> i think i have noticed a wrong behaviour with xflags. When they are set
>> in a failure_route and a t_relay is done after that to a destination, its
>> state is lost in the next on_reply route.
>> This doesn't happen with regular transaction flags, and it doesn't happen
>> with xflags either when xflag is set inside an onreply_route.
>> We have seen it on versions 5.3 and 5.4
>>
>> Could you please confirm this?
>> thanks a lot
>> regards
>> david escartin
>>
>> --
>> [image: Logo]
>>
>> David Escartín Almudévar
>> VoIP/Switch Engineer
>> descartin at sonoc.io
>>
>> *SONOC*
>> C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España
>> Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io
>>
>
>
> --
> [image: Logo]
>
> David Escartín Almudévar
> VoIP/Switch Engineer
> descartin at sonoc.io
>
> *SONOC*
> C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España
> Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io
>


-- 
[image: Logo]

David Escartín Almudévar
VoIP/Switch Engineer
descartin at sonoc.io

*SONOC*
C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España
Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20210409/2f99b60d/attachment-0001.htm>