[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Branch ordering behavior changed between v5.3 and v5.4 (#2449)

[Victor Seva]

Hi,

El mié., 26 ago. 2020 20:25, Cindy Leung <notifications at github.com>
escribió:

> Is it possible that the branches are handled differently when they're
> added by append_branch()?
>
>         append_branch("sip:1001 at gateway1.carrierB.com;transport=tcp", "0.3");
>         append_branch("sip:1001 at gateway2.carrierB.com;transport=tcp", "0.2");
>         append_branch("sip:1001 at gateway3.carrierB.com;transport=tcp", "0.7");
>         append_branch("sip:1001 at gateway4.carrierB.com;transport=tcp", "0.5");
>         append_branch("sip:1001 at gateway5.carrierB.com;transport=tcp", "0.6");
>         xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[0]), $(branch(q)[0])\n");
>         xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[1]), $(branch(q)[1])\n");
>         xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[2]), $(branch(q)[2])\n");
>         xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[3]), $(branch(q)[3])\n");
>         xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[4]), $(branch(q)[4])\n");
>         t_load_contacts();
>         while (t_next_contacts()) {
>             xlog ("==== $ru\n");
>         }
>
>
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_load_contacts

Function t_load_contacts() **removes all branches** from the current
destination set and stores them into the XAVP whose name is configured with
the parameter contacts_avp

It doesn't matter how you're adding branches before. t_load_contacts() will
remove them.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2449#issuecomment-681135784
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20200826/9967ffac/attachment.htm>