[sr-dev] Unable to make SIP Calls (403 Forbidden - Domain Not Served)

David Villasmil david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
Fri Apr 17 12:38:46 CEST 2020


You need to trace sip. There’s a loop somewhere. Use tshark (wireshark) or
sngrep or ngrep, or some similar network tracing tool.

On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 11:34, Pavithra M <pavimohan3096 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi ,
>
> I am getting the call connected and got 200 ok from the client . But the
> INVITE packet goes multiple times between terminating pcscf and s-cscf and
> gives too many hops error .Even After that call goes perfectly fine with
> 200 ok message.
> What would be the reason . I am not getting any errors in my logs with
> debug log level 6 .
>
> Kindly tell me what could be the issue .
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, 2:16 PM David Villasmil <
> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That usually happens when you don’t set a next hop, or destination where
>> the packet should go,  so the packet of forwarded to the same destination,
>> which is the proxy again.
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 06:56, Pavithra M <pavimohan3096 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have enabled all debug logs and i traced it and I found that as you
>>> said it is keep on looping the invite in pcscf instead of going to other UE
>>> . I couldn't able to find the reason.Can you please give me some input on
>>> this.
>>>
>>> Debug logs of pcscf :
>>> 0#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.c9499ad5ce252a99a36ad8b9b70f04d4.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.a00d9260e4373806e691bfa2828ab215.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.6ab08c40989814cf3726b826bdef39d2.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.e650088370f5d61c0d902d1a40fc1252.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.44a3f1c7026e2d42810722ae5c4bf942.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.54030b75c055258251ec7e6980c78c74.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.9a08d87ec59a03501dcd55413ce046eb.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.f36a9dba7b795e3b96df4bb6b480a688.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.b49469c77e102314d82036734a413360.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.221403deba39c28c50f332a8fde22646.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.77f89368e68665c1e3ffdc1d1bea7bab.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060
>>> ;branch=z9hG4bK7014.2e5981568975ea5c81876a9dded1bc08.0#
>>> 015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.19809abdb9c351fdce7e25f51e8c1754.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.ad73d18d15b6c9da96e13156a84d5522.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.fcb5555d6a683215aa989fb4254abd62.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.244b467757383234c76b1c66f98ddfe8.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.b2c353ef1d637907359822c64cb81b2a.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.d22dceb1af0320cfc769f94e0214a313.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.f5e9b7f9b209c82971ae1017b9ad7d1e.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.0f2c98bc92cc799fdce0a4090b626021.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.aa8a07d89f83a26cefd74e4770aef63c.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.94c376a77d066ffe113e84465f5f5311.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.2202e658b1d8b801b14ec432bae7fabe.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.55f7d6a5d9d2a9d064cf1c6683f12eca.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.6870e53f3bc573f140d1728401dd43ae.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.a84d83df8646a75ee0d3605dcacb45ad.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.486b6fb0d17077e20f8375188a8bee75.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.bc0321f98578ab09ad615b634c4c83cd.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.9b26fda9326632abf7bdb32a33d03ab2.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.060fa4afc70848b34ede46705b90f7cb.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.56134adb7c492f7a4f03b36dfbf713f5.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.f9ccc5e81175283c9b4b56f4a2252c0f.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.3c231176b0e95b8121637df41b504f18.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.95bd5b0e0bf8c2bda906a751816a9876.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.87e0fd0a1bd044147d22052d27e07527.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.73:4080;branch=z9hG4bK7014.0a319c71a9a26c8afa77713d6d4ecfed.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.79:4070;branch=z9hG4bK7014.1442d975c0a393f232020916a6fbfc15.1#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.73:4080;branch=z9hG4bK7014.e35a84678ec61f7cefa8cdacb6ba92d9.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.179:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7014.cc99617f0c0f5088f45e203f6a58dd57.0#015#012Via:
>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 10.45.6.174:36029;received=10.45.6.174;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---c856c42a33d1e959;rport=36029#015#012To:
>>> <sip:bob at sip.example.com>;tag=8409f602ccf3f3f0da6ebceab6ff6336.aa5bd74f#015#012From:
>>> <sip:alice at sip.example.com;transport=UDP>;tag=cdbaae3f#015#012Call-ID:
>>> I-58e6z5tN3aDpmdzq1oVA..#015#012CSeq: 1 INVITE#015#012Server: TelcoSuite
>>> Proxy-CSCF#015#012Content-Length: 0
>>>
>>> As you see here , continuously invite is going on looping in 10.45.6.179
>>> IP which is pcscf. What could be the reason .. Kindly do the needful.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020, 2:19 PM David Villasmil <
>>> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You should be tracing, you’re probably not, otherwise you would see the
>>>> server is probably forwarding the INVITE to itself (removing one hop every
>>>> time as it must) and thus creating a loop.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 09:42, Pavithra M <pavimohan3096 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi ,
>>>>> Yes , I have tried uncommenting that part . It is actually checking
>>>>> for hostname (sip.example.com:5060) in my scscf node. I am not sure
>>>>> why it is looking for sip.example.com instead of
>>>>> scscf.sip.example.com:4080
>>>>>
>>>>> I have added one more alias in my scscf.cfg file .Now Domain not
>>>>> served issue has gone.
>>>>> After that I am facing 483 Too Many Hops Error.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have added scscf debug logs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:482]: qm_free(): qm_free(0x7fc57b362010,
>>>>> 0x7fc57b514138), called from ims_registrar_scscf: lookup.c: lookup(225)
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:526]: qm_free(): freeing frag. 0x7fc57b514100 alloc'ed
>>>>> from ims_registrar_scscf: lookup.c: lookup(103)
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: ERROR: ***
>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[FINAL_TERM] c=[/etc/kamailio/scscf/kamailio.cfg]
>>>>> l=1041 a=16 n=if
>>>>> * Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>>> [core/socket_info.c:628]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 10==10 &&
>>>>> [10.45.6.75] == [10.45.6.73]*
>>>>> * Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>>> [core/socket_info.c:635]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 4080
>>>>> (advertise 0) matches port 32347*
>>>>> * Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>>> [core/forward.c:412]: check_self(): host != me*
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: ERROR: ***
>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[FINAL_TERM] c=[/etc/kamailio/scscf/kamailio.cfg]
>>>>> l=1050 a=5 n=route
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: ERROR: ***
>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[apply_privacy] c=[/etc/kamailio/scscf/kamailio.cfg]
>>>>> l=821 a=16 n=if
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: ERROR: ***
>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[apply_privacy] c=[/etc/kamailio/scscf/kamailio.cfg]
>>>>> l=818 a=25 n=is_present_hf
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: ERROR: ***
>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[FINAL_TERM] c=[/etc/kamailio/scscf/kamailio.cfg]
>>>>> l=1052 a=24 n=t_relay
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: tm
>>>>> [t_lookup.c:1328]: t_newtran(): msg (0x7fc57b502a70) id=2/7139 global
>>>>> id=2/7139 T start=(nil)
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: tm
>>>>> [t_lookup.c:497]: t_lookup_request(): start searching: hash=38849, isACK=0
>>>>> * Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: tm
>>>>> [t_lookup.c:455]: matching_3261(): RFC3261 transaction matching failed -
>>>>> via branch [z9hG4bK1c79.03e4ec0c2ca15f1aa14c067b33a29f10.1]*
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: tm
>>>>> [t_lookup.c:675]: t_lookup_request(): no transaction found
>>>>> Apr 15 13:59:12 tel-VirtualBox kamailio[7139]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:374]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fc57478b000, 5720)
>>>>> called from tm: h_table.c: build_cell(330)
>>>>>
>>>>> I am facing host is not me error . Here 10.45.6.73 -> scscf and
>>>>> 10.45.6.75 -> UE (bob user)
>>>>> I am not sure what alias it is asking for . Kindly help.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 1:36 PM Pafel <pafels at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most likely this is because of the change. Revert back the changes
>>>>>> (uncomment the section I told you), turn on debug in scscf.cfg, restart all
>>>>>> nodes and test once again. Then have a look on the scscf logs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Pavel Siderov
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
>>>>>> sr-dev at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
>>>>> sr-dev at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> David Villasmil
>>>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>>>> phone: +34669448337
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
>>>> sr-dev at lists.kamailio.org
>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
>>> sr-dev at lists.kamailio.org
>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> David Villasmil
>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>> phone: +34669448337
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
>> sr-dev at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
> sr-dev at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
-- 
Regards,

David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
phone: +34669448337
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20200417/dac59ea5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the sr-dev mailing list