[sr-dev] no luck with xflags
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 09:40:54 CEST 2018
I pushed a patch for it -- onreply_route was using the xflags from reply
structure, not from transaction.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.03.18 10:02, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> I tested xflags by making these calls in a route block:
>
> INFO(********** setting flag 19);
> setflag(19);
> INFO(********** setting xflag 19);
> setxflag(19);
>
> and these calls in onreply_route block:
>
> if (isflagset(19))
> INFO(********* flag 19 is set);
> else
> INFO(********* flag 19 is NOT set);
> if (isxflagset(19))
> INFO(********* xflag 19 is set);
> else
> INFO(********* xflag 19 is NOT set);
>
> The result to syslog was:
>
> Mar 25 10:51:50 trout /usr/bin/sip-proxy[17939]: INFO: ********** setting flag 19
> Mar 25 10:51:50 trout /usr/bin/sip-proxy[17939]: INFO: ********** setting xflag 19
> Mar 25 10:51:50 trout /usr/bin/sip-proxy[17867]: INFO: ********* flag 19 is set
> Mar 25 10:51:50 trout /usr/bin/sip-proxy[17867]: INFO: ********* xflag 19 is NOT set
>
> -- Juha
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
> sr-dev at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - April 16-18, 2018, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list