[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] define flag_t as unsigned long (#1288)

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

As I wrote on the mailing list, flags should not be migrated to the transaction after t_newtran() unless one uses t_flush_flags() -- that was the desired functionality, otherwise t_flush_flags() has no purpose.

You opened another item on this tracker related to this unexpected behaviour (#1490), and I think it is better to sort this out there, because that is the unexpected behaviour. xflags behave as expected. Whatever will be the conclusion of #1490 will be applied to both flags and xflags, but makes no sense to track an issue with two separate items.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1288#issuecomment-378834818
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20180404/4878a00d/attachment.html>