[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] IPv6 parse_uri error (#1136)

David Wang notifications at github.com
Tue Jun 6 18:01:47 CEST 2017


Thank you, miconda. We don't set r-uri value in pcscf.cfg, icscf.cfg or scscf.cfg. I will show more details below using the logs with Jitsi. I will omit SDP to save space.

1. When PCSCF received the Sip Invite from caller, the Sip headers look fine:

INVITE sip:bob at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org SIP/2.0
Call-ID: 0b23b2ee62c061ae9f3cc1569b7824b3 at 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0
CSeq: 1 INVITE
From: "alice" <sip:alice at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>;tag=94b2833a
To: <sip:bob at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-393032-567b1c47371a83386f685807100ab5bd
Max-Forwards: 70
Contact: "alice" <sip:alice@[fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=ims_mnc001_mcc001_3gppnetwork_org>
User-Agent: Jitsi2.10.5550Linux
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 910

2. Then PCSCF sent it to SCSCF:

INVITE sip:bob at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org SIP/2.0
Route: <sip:orig at scscf.ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org:5060;lr>
Record-Route: <sip:mo@[FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:45];lr=on;ftag=94b2833a;nat=yes;did=991.9181>
Call-ID: 0b23b2ee62c061ae9f3cc1569b7824b3 at 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0
CSeq: 1 INVITE
From: "alice" <sip:alice at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>;tag=94b2833a
To: <sip:bob at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:45];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.9247221bd3cd63299ff9b3e1486a94e0.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK-393032-567b1c47371a83386f685807100ab5bd
Max-Forwards: 69
Contact: "alice" <sip:alice@[fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=ims_mnc001_mcc001_3gppnetwork_org>
User-Agent: Jitsi2.10.5550Linux
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 910
P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:alice at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>
X-RTP: mo

3. The SCSCF sent to ICSCF:

INVITE sip:bob at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:mo@[FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:47];lr=on;ftag=94b2833a;did=991.b322>
Record-Route: <sip:mo@[FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:45];lr=on;ftag=94b2833a;nat=yes;did=991.9181>
Call-ID: 0b23b2ee62c061ae9f3cc1569b7824b3 at 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0
CSeq: 1 INVITE
From: "alice" <sip:alice at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>;tag=94b2833a
To: <sip:bob at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:47];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.3b5263a0a9b70cdde23243c3423be371.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:45];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.9247221bd3cd63299ff9b3e1486a94e0.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK-393032-567b1c47371a83386f685807100ab5bd
Max-Forwards: 68
Contact: "alice" <sip:alice@[fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=ims_mnc001_mcc001_3gppnetwork_org>
User-Agent: Jitsi2.10.5550Linux
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 910
X-RTP: mo
P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:alice at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>

4. Then ICSCF sent it to SCSCF:

INVITE sip:bob at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org SIP/2.0
Route: <sip:scscf.ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org:5060>
Record-Route: <sip:mo@[FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:47];lr=on;ftag=94b2833a;did=991.b322>
Record-Route: <sip:mo@[FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:45];lr=on;ftag=94b2833a;nat=yes;did=991.9181>
Call-ID: 0b23b2ee62c061ae9f3cc1569b7824b3 at 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0
CSeq: 1 INVITE
From: "alice" <sip:alice at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>;tag=94b2833a
To: <sip:bob at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:46];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.acefb88ca4d295d2bd315467f0670d7f.1
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:47];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.3b5263a0a9b70cdde23243c3423be371.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:45];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.9247221bd3cd63299ff9b3e1486a94e0.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK-393032-567b1c47371a83386f685807100ab5bd
Max-Forwards: 67
Contact: "alice" <sip:alice@[fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=ims_mnc001_mcc001_3gppnetwork_org>
User-Agent: Jitsi2.10.5550Linux
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 910
X-RTP: mo
P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:alice at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>

5. Then SCSCF sent it to the PCSCF of the callee:

INVITE sip:bob@[fc00:1234:3:2:0:0:0:0]:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=ims_mnc001_mcc001_3gppnetwork_org SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:mt@[FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:47];lr=on;ftag=94b2833a;did=991.b322>
Route: <sip:term at pcscf.ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org:5060;nat=yes;received=sip:FC00:1234:3:2:0:0:0:0:5060;lr>
Record-Route: <sip:mo@[FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:47];lr=on;ftag=94b2833a;did=991.b322>
Record-Route: <sip:mo@[FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:45];lr=on;ftag=94b2833a;nat=yes;did=991.9181>
Call-ID: 0b23b2ee62c061ae9f3cc1569b7824b3 at 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0
CSeq: 1 INVITE
From: "alice" <sip:alice at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>;tag=94b2833a
To: <sip:bob at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:47];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.da418b33c49aee4296db5cf6393c2c36.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:46];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.acefb88ca4d295d2bd315467f0670d7f.1
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:47];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.3b5263a0a9b70cdde23243c3423be371.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [FC00:1234:1:0:0:0:0:45];branch=z9hG4bK0d1b.9247221bd3cd63299ff9b3e1486a94e0.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK-393032-567b1c47371a83386f685807100ab5bd
Max-Forwards: 66
Contact: "alice" <sip:alice@[fc00:1234:3:1:0:0:0:0]:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=ims_mnc001_mcc001_3gppnetwork_org>
User-Agent: Jitsi2.10.5550Linux
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 910
X-RTP: mo
P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:alice at ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>

In the last invite message, there is sip:FC00:1234:3:2:0:0:0:0:5060 which doesn't have [ ] and probably cause this issue. 

Any thoughts?



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1136#issuecomment-306533802
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20170606/33e818c4/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the sr-dev mailing list