[sr-dev] $fU pv Assign New Value Isnt Rewrite old value

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Tue Oct 4 08:07:03 CEST 2016


Hello,

it is by design -- $fU is an operation over a sip header, which is done
in a special way for performance considerations -- for more details and
how to deal with multiple changes see:

 -
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers_or

Cheers,
Daniel

On 04/10/16 01:13, Cléviton Mendes de Araújo wrote:
> Hi,Kamailio Community
>
>
>
> Is there a bug when we assign new value to $fU pseudo-variable multi time?
>
> My scenery is according below:
>
>
>
> In a point on config file, let us that $fU value is: 7777. When I do
> assign:
>
> .....
> $fU = "5555" + $fU;        ### Here $fU = 55557777
> .....
>
> In another point, let us that value $sht(htble=>$var(nnnn)) hold is:
> 44444444. And I do:
>
> .....
> $fU = $sht(htble=>$var(nnnn));     #### Here, it seems that this is
> happening $fU = 5555777744444444
> .....
>
> When I turn on ngrep analysis, I catch From header:
>
> .................
> .................
> From: "User Name" <sip:5555777744444444 at IP-Address>
> .................
> .................
>
>
> This two assignments are realizing on same route block.
>
> So, it seems to be a bug.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> CMA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20161004/116b08a0/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-dev mailing list