[sr-dev] Pike RPC

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

no sure why it was developed like this, maybe just a bare translation
from the mi old format.

The proposed format is better and properly following structured
responses for rpc. If you want to develop it, go ahead and then make a
pull request, it will be merged.

Thanks,
Daniel

On 24/08/16 09:47, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> Is there any reason why the Pike RPC is not returning an array and
> instead using integer suffixes? ip_addr0, ip_addr1, etc
>
> If it will not break anything I would like to change this behavior.
>
> here is a sample:
>
> {  
>    "max_hits":16,
>    "ip_addr0":"XX0.5X.X3.1XX",
>    "leaf_hits_prev0":51,
>    "leaf_hits_curr0":9,
>    "expires0":4,
>    "status0":"HOT",
>    "ip_addr1":"XX8.1X9.8.X7",
>    "leaf_hits_prev1":17,
>    "leaf_hits_curr1":0,
>    "expires1":2,
>    "status1":"HOT",
>    "number_of_rows":2
> }
>
>
> here is what i propose:
>
> {
>   "max_hits":16,
>    "number_of_rows":2,
>    "list" :
>    [
>       {  
>          "ip_addr":"XX0.5X.X3.1XX",
>          "leaf_hits_prev":51,
>          "leaf_hits_curr":9,
>          "expires":4,
>          "status":"HOT"
>       },
>       {
>          "ip_addr":"XX8.1X9.8.X7",
>          "leaf_hits_prev":17,
>          "leaf_hits_curr":0,
>          "expires":2,
>          "status":"HOT"
>       }
>    ]
> }
>
> Kelvin Chua
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20160825/3b3e4c10/attachment.html>