[sr-dev] Dispatcher id's question

[Olle E. Johansson]

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 15:22, Alekzander Spiridonov <sipidronov at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> No need to map whatever id is to a number. Let's say data is maintained by other sub-systems, so with current implementation either these sub-sys's have to work with digit id's only or K have to have some sort of mapping.
> Both options are not actually flexible.
> 
> Although I do understand that use of int id's was kind of an "over-optimization" =)
Well, at start we only had numeric route-names, but we changed that. 
Any source code to fix this in dispatcher would be welcome!

Cheers,
/O
> 
> 2016-04-05 16:06 GMT+03:00 Olle E. Johansson <oej at edvina.net <mailto:oej at edvina.net>>:
> 
> > On 05 Apr 2016, at 12:39, Alekzander Spiridonov <sipidronov at gmail.com <mailto:sipidronov at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I was wondering if any work is in progress making dispatcher operate with non-numeric pool id's? Plans or todo's? Or may be some successor to replace dispatcher?
> 
> Not that I’m aware of.
> 
> Curious - what would be the benefit? Is there something you can’t easily do today that would work with non-numeric ID’s?
> 
> /O
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Alekzander Spiridonov
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20160405/8184d0e8/attachment.html>