[sr-dev] CAC module idea
Alekzander Spiridonov
sipidronov at gmail.com
Wed Oct 28 15:48:20 CET 2015
I believe bandwidth shuld be checked in media-processor since it's aware of
number of ports used and codecs in each of them.
2015-10-28 17:40 GMT+03:00 Guillaume <tetram100 at hotmail.fr>:
> Thanks for your return and your advices.
>
> In fact the bandwidth criteria would have meaning only if kamailio is a
> media gateway (otherwise we could only have a rough estimation with the
> negotiated codec as you said) and in this case getting the bandwidth from
> the interface will make sense.
>
> I was also thinking about using a limit for the number of call per user
> but it would be redundant with the dialog module, doesn't it?
>
> At the end do you think it's a good idea to add such features to kamailio?
>
>
> Guillaume
>
>
> ------------------------------
> To: sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> From: miconda at gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:04:25 +0100
> Subject: Re: [sr-dev] CAC module idea
>
>
> Hello,
>
> perhaps piplelimit can be reused to some extent for call attempts. IIRC,
> it has also come code for getting some cpu metrics, don't recall by heart
> what exactly. But the point would be -- if you are going to write a cac
> module, code inside pipelimit can help.
>
> For available memory, there are some functions to get the available
> pkg/shm (used for statistics as well), so this should be easy to approach.
> System memory makes sense if there are external libraries linked by
> kamailio that potentially consume it, otherwise kamailio is mailing using
> pkg/shm for its internal needs. pkg/shm pool have fixed size.
>
> Bandwith will be the hardest to assert at SIP layer in my opinion, but you
> can take it from a network interface tool. In sip, you can eventually rely
> on per codec bandwidth estimation, but that might not be really accurate
> and new streams can be added or older removed via re-INVITE.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 28/10/15 13:39, Guillaume wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking about doing a Call Admission Control module. It will allow
> the admin to setup limits in order to improve the global quality and to
> prevent overload of the service.
> It would have these criteria for admitting or not a call (you can propose
> other criteria):
> * Number of call attempt per second
> * Maximal number of concurrent sessions
> * CPU limit
> * RAM limit
> * Maximal bandwidth
> * Call priority header
>
> For now I haven't seen a module for that. And the dialog module could be
> useful for to implement the criteria that needs to know the number of call
> still active. It doesn't seem to be a too heavy task and it seems useful.
>
> What do you think about it?
>
>
> Guillaume
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing listsr-dev at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
>
>
> _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
>
--
Best regards,
Alekzander Spiridonov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20151028/807a996c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list