[sr-dev] nat keepalive partitioning in usrloc db only mode

[Juha Heinanen]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

> I think this is a fix and still ok to apply in this testing phase. There
> is no new feature comparing with previous stable, but making it be the
> same in functionality. However, I wanted to check with all devs and see
> other opinions. And again, it is only about db_mode=DB_ONLY for
> usrloc.

what is the performance impact of this compared to the present raw query
implementation that fetches id modulo x from location table?

also, is there any performance implications on normal lookups and saves
in db only mode?

-- juha