[sr-dev] New module DMQ_SYNC and patch for DMQ
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Wed Oct 29 22:10:19 CET 2014
I was actually thinking of it, but couldn't get to a clear conclusion
before ...
Overall, I am not sure if making white or black is the best. I see it
more of a per case situation.
For example, usrloc is a standalone component by itself, with registrar
being the interface to kamailio.cfg, then pua_usrloc or pua_reginfo
being the presence events publishing. Being such a component used in
various directions, I think it should stay rather independent, not
getting extra stuff inside, but other components can be built on top of
its exported API.
On the other hand, just adding a new module for each other module that
wants to notify via dmq could be an unnecessary overhead.
So, at this moment, I would say, if the module has everything that is
needed exported via API, the dmq can be done as separate module. Also,
if the module is very sensitive, I would suggest the same approach
(e.g., I wouldn't like to see it inside tm module, if someone thinks of
dmq-ing transactions, but rather a separate module or part of tmx).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 29/10/14 19:38, Charles Chance wrote:
> Maybe others can offer their advice as to which is the preferred way
> to go?
>
>
>
> On 28 October 2014 14:40, Andrey Rybkin <rybkin.a at bks.tv
> <mailto:rybkin.a at bks.tv>> wrote:
>
> Thought about to add this functionality to the module. If this
> approach seems to be more correct, then I can move my code in a
> module, but, in my opinion, it is not very correct.
> ________________________________
> Andrey Rybkin
> JID: rybkin.a at bks.tv <mailto:rybkin.a at bks.tv>
> E-Mail: rybkin.a at bks.tv <mailto:rybkin.a at bks.tv>
>
> 2014-10-28 16:46 GMT+03:00 Alex Hermann <alex at speakup.nl
> <mailto:alex at speakup.nl>>:
>
> On Tuesday 28 October 2014, Андрей Рыбкин wrote:
> > Module DMQ_SYNC:
> > The module add replication between multiple servers via
> DMQ module.
> > Currently only usrloc replications.
>
> I think some decision should be made on where syncing code
> should be placed.
> The htable module has dmq sync integrated, now you introduce a
> module
> dedicated to syncing via dmq.
>
> I have no strong preference, but am against different
> implementations
> depending on the module. So i would prefer either dmq-sync
> integrated into
> each module, or one dmq_sync module. Not a combination of both.
>
>
> > TODO:
> > 1. dialog replications.
> > 2. bugfixes.
> >
> > Patch fo DMQ:
> > 1. add find_dmq_node_uri function to API
> > dmq_node_t* find_dmq_node_uri(str* uri)
>
> > 2. add init_callback to dmq_peer
> > int init_callback()
>
> Except for the broken indenting, this seems equal to my code.
> If it is mine,
> and the code is useful, please cherry-pick the relevant
> commits so authorship
> is retained.
>
> --
> Greetings,
>
> Alex Hermann
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
>
>
>
> www.sipcentric.com <http://www.sipcentric.com/>
>
> Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric>
>
> Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no.
> 7365592. Registered office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham
> Campus, Holt Street, Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20141029/edda850d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list