[sr-dev] Possible bug in app_perl
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Fri May 2 10:40:04 CEST 2014
The return codes have a special interpretation in the config file:
* >0 - is true
* <0 - is false
* =0 - exit config file execution
http://www.asipto.com/pub/kamailio-devel-guide/#c16return_values
I guess perl_exec() returns what is returned from the perl script.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02/05/14 02:01, James Cloos wrote:
> Given this code in .cfg:
>
> if (!perl_exec("verify", "route_LOCATION")) {
> xlog("L_INFO", "Invite verify failed for ruri: $ru\n");
> sl_send_reply("403", "Not Allowed");
> exit;
> }
>
> if the perl function returns 1 everything proceeds nicely (skipping the if
> block as as expected).
>
> But should the perl function return 0 (which seemed like the right choice
> for failure) the call fails to progress; the if block does not run, and
> nothing else does either. The INVITing sip client retries and times out.
>
> I had to return a negative value to get the if block to run.
>
> Expected? Or bug?
>
> (Running deb's sid build on amd64.)
>
> -JimC
> --
> James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list