[sr-dev] Supported RFCs

[Fred Posner]

On 07/17/2014 04:06 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 07/17/2014 03:53 PM, Fred Posner wrote:
> 
>> The question is very difficult to answer, for the reasons Alex
>> explained....
>>
>> The core of Kamailio is an RFC3261 SIP Server.
>>
>> Adding or using different modules will to the list of RFCs... such as
>> with CPL module (RFC3880), invoking P-asserted-identity (RFC3325), using
>> DNS NAPTR (RFC2915), Websockets (RFC6455), etc.
> 
> I assume that what's actually going on here is that someone's
> boss/management/client/stakeholder made the arbitrary requirement,
> however nonsensical it is to us engineers, to list the RFCs supported
> and compare them that way.
> 
> In that case, a political solution is required, not a technically
> accurate one. And the political solution is to list as many pertinent
> RFCs as possible. This is useful:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5411/?include_text=1
> 
> I encourage you to look at the title of that RFC and ponder why it
> exists, and consider my answer in that light. It wasn't meant to be
> hostile or standoffish. It's just the reality.
> 
> -- Alex
> 

I do want to write a module to make Kamailio RFC 2324 compliant, but am
waiting for the proper hardware.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2324/?include_text=1

--fred