[sr-dev] rtpengine ICE droppings

[Peter Villeneuve]

Just recomplied rtpengine with your latest commit.
Indeed it seems to be handling non-rfc-compliant host priorities much
better.

D/libpjsip( 8663): a=candidate:Sc0a80104 1 UDP 1862270975 85.xx.xx.xx 4025
typ srflx raddr 192.168.1.4 rport 4025
D/libpjsip( 8663): a=candidate:Hc0a80104 1 UDP *1694498815* 192.168.1.4
4025 typ host
D/libpjsip( 8663): a=candidate:Sc0a80104 2 UDP 1862270974 85.xx.xx.xx 4006
typ srflx raddr 192.168.1.4 rport 4006
D/libpjsip( 8663): a=candidate:Hc0a80104 2 UDP 1694498814 192.168.1.4 4006
typ host
D/libpjsip( 8663): a=sendrecv
D/libpjsip( 8663): a=rtcp:30009
D/libpjsip( 8663): a=candidate:Pi2sMxReBtxalHXF 1 UDP *1694498559*
190.xx.xx.xx 30008 typ host
D/libpjsip( 8663): a=candidate:Pi2sMxReBtxalHXF 2 UDP 1694498558
190.xx.xx.xx 30009 typ host

Thanks for such a quick response.

Cheers,
Peter


On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Richard Fuchs <rfuchs at sipwise.com> wrote:

> On 07/06/14 15:44, Peter Villeneuve wrote:
> > Just to follow up, it seems you are correct in that PJSIP seems to
> > reverse the priorities for host and srflx.
> > No clue why they do this, but it's a pain.
>
> FWIW, I've just pushed a commit which should allow rtpengine to deal
> with situations like this better.
>
> cheers
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20140708/afee9a9f/attachment.html>