[sr-dev] Dynamic port binding of Kamailio post-startup

[Jason Penton]

Hey Alex,

IPSEC in IMS environments. Basically client and server "protected" ports at
each end UE and Sip Proxy are negotiated during registration. Such security
associations exist for the duration of the registration. If you are bored
you can see the 3gpp spec TS 33.203 ;)

Cheers
Jason


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>wrote:

> Curious: what is the intent/use-case?
>
>
> On 04/01/2014 01:33 PM, Jason Penton wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> I have a requirement to dynamically bind new ports to Kamailio during
>> run-time and am trying to decide on a possible impl. Right now I am
>> thinking the best way is to create a new thread for each dynamic bind
>> and then replicate the code found in udp_rcv_loop(), ultimately calling
>> recevice_msg() to do all the modular processing and route block
>> executions. I know this would cater for UDP only at the moment but I
>> suspect a similar concept could be employed for TCP.
>>
>> Does anybody have any other ideas or foresee any problems?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sr-dev mailing list
>> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>>
>>
>
> --
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
> Suite 106
> Decatur, GA 30030
> United States
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20140401/f1207712/attachment-0001.html>