[sr-dev] git:hpw/branch_failure_route: modules/tm: Initial revision of branch_failure_route

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

wouldn't be possible to reuse the event_route concept for this case? I 
would try to avoid keep adding new routing block in the core.

Maybe something as:
...
t_on_branch_failure("xyz");
..
event_route[tm:branch-failure:xyz] {
...
}

In this way the flex/bison part from core does not need to be changed at 
all.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 3/19/13 4:45 PM, Hugh Waite wrote:
> Module: sip-router
> Branch: hpw/branch_failure_route
> Commit: 4e0cf550f75835b3f97bda9bb7934389a54b1f18
> URL:    http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=4e0cf550f75835b3f97bda9bb7934389a54b1f18
>
> Author: Hugh Waite <hugh.waite at crocodile-rcs.com>
> Committer: Hugh Waite <hugh.waite at crocodile-rcs.com>
> Date:   Tue Mar 19 15:41:55 2013 +0000
>
> modules/tm: Initial revision of branch_failure_route
>
> - New branch_failure_route defined
> - cfg route is called but xlog() causes segfault
>
> ---
>
>   modules/tm/h_table.h  |    4 ++
>   modules/tm/t_fwd.c    |    1 +
>   modules/tm/t_hooks.h  |    6 +++-
>   modules/tm/t_lookup.c |    1 +
>   modules/tm/t_reply.c  |   97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   modules/tm/t_reply.h  |    7 ++++
>   modules/tm/tm.c       |   27 ++++++++++++++
>   modules/tm/tm_load.c  |    1 +
>   modules/tm/tm_load.h  |    2 +
>   9 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> Diff:   http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commitdiff;h=4e0cf550f75835b3f97bda9bb7934389a54b1f18
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin
  - http://conference.kamailio.com -