[sr-dev] Why doesn't Kamailio handler x-NAT field ?
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Tue Mar 5 13:44:46 CET 2013
I think that's what I was trying to say, but did not quite say.
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault at viagenie.ca> wrote:
>Le 2013-03-05 13:04, Khoa Pham a écrit :
>> When client use STUN, it can detect the NAT type.
>
>This is not true in many important cases. See RFC 5780.
>
>Trying to detect a NAT type is useless and the result will be fragile.
>
>Simon
>
>_______________________________________________
>sr-dev mailing list
>sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a fully-fledged keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list