[sr-dev] Why doesn't Kamailio handler x-NAT field ?

[Khoa Pham]

@Alex:

Many router out there are using Full cone NAT.


On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>wrote:

> On 03/05/2013 07:04 AM, Khoa Pham wrote:
>
>  When client use STUN, it can detect the NAT type. When client
>> register, it contains x-NAT (0:unknown, 1: full cone, ..., 6:
>> symmetric), which will be helpful for the server to detect NAT type.
>>
>
> Again, where are you finding these nonsymmetric clients?  The amount of
> non-symmetrical SIP and RTP implementations out there in the wild at this
> point is negligible.
>
> --
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
> Suite 106
> Decatur, GA 30030
> United States
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**dev<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev>
>



-- 
Khoa Pham
HCMC University of Science
Faculty of Information Technology
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20130305/af147f95/attachment.htm>