[sr-dev] [tracker] Task opened: Entity URI in NOTIFY XML body (Attachment added)

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Fri Jul 12 14:30:20 CEST 2013


On 7/12/13 2:20 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> the question is which format is the correct one (entity value with uri
>> shcema (sip:) or without)? Or maybe both formats are ok?!?
> as it was mentioned by the author, all examples in standards include uri
> scheme and in the document syntax specify uri. uri always contains uri
> scheme, otherwise it is not uri.
It was not clear from your previous statement that your experience with 
other cases when there was no schema was the right or wrong way. Because 
the patch adds schema to entity in an xml doc constructed by 
presence_dialoginfo module. Therefore seems to be a bug in the module if 
sip: is missing, which is fixed by that patch.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20130712/009e15d3/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-dev mailing list