[sr-dev] [tracker] Task opened: Entity URI in NOTIFY XML body (Attachment added)

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Fri Jul 12 14:16:32 CEST 2013

On 7/12/13 12:28 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> sip-router writes:
>> Details - Hi. We had a small problem with polycom phones to realize
>> blf functionality. On yealink, cisco, aastra etc works like a
>> charm. We discover that in xml body of NOTIFY, entity uri doesn't
>> contain a "sip:" value. In RFC 4235 however in xml body "sip:" is on
>> every example. I've modify notify_body.c in presence_dialoginfo module
>> to enable BLF functionality for polycom phone by adding "sip:" to
>> entity pres and it works. I wonder it's ok?
> i have noticed uri scheme missing from entity uri also in other presence
> documents not related to blf.  in my opinion, the clients should be
> fixed rather that start patching them in sip proxy or xcap server.
the question is which format is the correct one (entity value with uri 
shcema (sip:) or without)? Or maybe both formats are ok?!?


Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

More information about the sr-dev mailing list