[sr-dev] erlrtpproxy (was: Re: ice support in media/rtp proxy)

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed Jan 2 19:14:36 CET 2013


Am 19.12.2012 12:28, schrieb Peter Lemenkov:
> 2012/12/19 Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com>:
>> ice seems to be at least in theory supported by several sip clients:
>> baresip, csipsimple, pjsip based clients, etc.
>>
>> one of the problems of ice is that is uses turn protocol to find ip
>> addresses/ports of relays in case end-to-end connectivity cannot be
>> established otherwise.  turn server, on the other hand, must
>> authenticates its clients.  this doubles authentication work and, worse,
>> a single turn server does not seem to be able to handle more than one
>> domain.  having each domain its own turn server is clearly not a
>> scalable solution.  so life would be easier without turn servers.
>>
>> mediaproxy module has solved this problem so that it adds the ice relay
>> candidates to sdp on behalf of ice clients and therefore no separate
>> turn servers nor turn client authentication are needed.
>>
>> have people who have worked on rtpproxy or mediaproxy-ng considered
>> supporting ice in the way mediaproxy modules does today?  any other
>> thoughts about this?
> I plan to add STUN/TURN directly into erlrtpproxy. And yes, this
> definitely needs a completely new protocol, JSON-based.
Hi Peter!

I just heard of erlrtpproxy for the first time. There is pretty no 
documentation in github. Is it comatible with rtpproxy. Are there any 
advantages over rtpproxy?

I would be cool of you can shortly present erlrtpproxy to the Kamailio 
users.

Thanks
Klaus



More information about the sr-dev mailing list