[sr-dev] Bug in $rU assignment?

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

user=phone parameter to r-uri involves some special handling, where what 
is after ; in the username part is considered parameters as well. It 
becomes something similar as tel uri. There is a rfc about this (or part 
of sip rfc, i don't remember right now -- google should find it). In the 
source code I could see that is a special processing when user=phone is 
found and user id is taken before ; in the username.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 12/4/13 9:11 AM, Javi Gallart wrote:
> Hi list
>
> we've found a (at least for me) strange behavior in kamailio 4.0.2 
> (didn't try this in other versions). Adding a parameter un the r-uri 
> host part renders different values for the $rU:
>
> Call 65: Full ru = sip:34661574758;npdi at 79.170.68.150
> Call 65: rU= 34661574758;npdi
>
> Call 66: Full ru = sip:34661574758;npdi at 79.170.68.150;user=phone
> Call 66: rU= 34661574758
>
>
> That is, if user=phone is added as a uri parameter the $rU changes 
> (incorrectly I guess).
>
> Waht do you think?
>
> Regards
>
> Javi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda