[sr-dev] Using GRUU and outbound

[Peter Dunkley]

If you look at the recent (yesterday and today) discussion on DISPATCH 
the conclusion appears to be that this is how it should work and that 
RFC 5626 should have been clearer on the behaviour.

Regards,

Peter

On 30/04/13 19:03, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Peter Dunkley writes:
>
>> Based on the discussions about outbound and in-dialog routing it seems
>> like we need to use GRUU and live with the fact that the route-set
>> changes (in breach of RFC 3261).
> why would route set (the one recorded by record-route headers) change
> because of gruu?  it doesn't in my tests.
>
>> Can anyone share a Kamailio registrar configuration that uses GRUU to
>> look-up in-dialog requests (preferably one that makes use of
>> t_load_contacts(), t_next_contact(), and t_next_contact_flow())?
> in-dialog requests don't deal with those t_ functions.  after loose_route()
> i use this:
>
>     if ($du == "") {
>          if (is_gruu()) {
>              if (!lookup("location")) {
>                  send_reply("404", "Not Found");
>                  exit;
>              } else {
>                  xlog("L_INFO", "Routing in-dialog $rm <$ru> from <$fu> to <$du>\n");
>              };
>
> -- juha
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev