[sr-dev] double record-routing also at outbound edge

[Peter Dunkley]

I think you have that now by using your new flag?


On 25/04/13 18:21, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Peter Dunkley writes:
>
>> I don't understand (functionally) what the difference between a
>> flow-token in a Path: header and the received parameter is.  So I don't
>> understand why a flow-token can't be put in a Path: header when using
>> GRUU.
> most likely you are correct, i.e., there is no problem with flow token
> in path header of register request as long as there is a way to avoid
> flow token in r-r uris.
>
> -- juha
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev