[sr-dev] segfault with t_suspend() / t_continue()
Dragos Oancea
droancea at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 4 21:42:06 CEST 2013
Hi Jason ,
It could be that it crashed in a CANCEL / 200 OK race condition. I clearly remember sending CANCEL for that call.
Maybe the reply that shows in "bt full" is the 200 OK reply that Kamailio generates for CANCEL ?
It might also be possible that it crashed after a succesfull t_suspend() , but I am not sure the other side received the INVITE and answered.
Dragos
________________________________
From: Jason Penton <jason.penton at gmail.com>
To: Dragos Oancea <droancea at yahoo.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List <sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org>
Cc: "miconda at gmail.com" <miconda at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [sr-dev] segfault with t_suspend() / t_continue()
Hey Dragos,
okay I just looked at your config and I see you are not using suspend/continue in a reply block so you shouldn't have crash.
Cheers
jason
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Dragos Oancea <droancea at yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel, hi Guys,
>
>
>I did not stress test it, I only had one registered device (which sent the INVITE) , and another one was supposed to register after some event triggered by kamailio via a http query (using the utils module) - that's
>the reason I parked the transaction with "t_suspend()" .
>When the REGISTER for the second device comes I send the INVITE to the it .( lookup() , t_relay() ) . This is a scenario that works for me. I could say I tested 10 times and 1 time crashed.
>I plan to stress test these days, let me know if I should get some information for you while doing it.
>
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Dragos
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>To: Dragos Oancea <droancea at yahoo.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List <sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org>
>Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 8:53 PM
>
>Subject: Re: [sr-dev] segfault with t_suspend() / t_continue()
>
>
>
>Hello,
>
>at first sight looks like a missing safety check, but I may be wrong
after a long day. I need to look a bit deeper at it.
>
>Did you stress test it or was just casual trying? You said it
happened one, couldn't be reproduced, right?
>
>Cheers,
>Daniel
>
>
>On 4/4/13 8:28 PM, Dragos Oancea wrote:
>
>Hi Daniel,
>>
>>
>>Here is the output of `bt full`:
>>http://pastebin.com/tnrWML3L
>>
>>Let me know if I can be of any assistance further.
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Dragos
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>>To: Dragos Oancea <droancea at yahoo.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List <sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org>
>>Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 7:28 PM
>>Subject: Re: [sr-dev] segfault with t_suspend() / t_continue()
>>
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>could be related, but the issue seems to be while
processing a SIP reply, not with suspend/continue of a
request. Can you send the output of 'bt full'?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Daniel
>>
>>
>>On 4/4/13 6:56 PM, Dragos Oancea wrote:
>>
>>Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I got the following coredump while doing some testing with t_suspend() and t_continue() on the first INVITE:
>>>
>>>
>>>(gdb) bt
>>>#0 qm_detach_free (qm=0x7fe2dae65000, size=16) at mem/q_malloc.c:269
>>>#1 qm_malloc (qm=0x7fe2dae65000, size=16) at mem/q_malloc.c:386
>>>#2 0x00007fe2e5e6d541 in update_totag_set (t=0x7fe2db0f42d0, ok=<value optimized out>) at t_reply.c:372
>>>#3 0x00007fe2e5e72387 in relay_reply (t=<value optimized out>, p_msg=<value optimized out>, branch=2, msg_status=200, cancel_data=0x7fff63fdf9b0, do_put_on_wait=1) at t_reply.c:1854
>>>#4 0x00007fe2e5e733e6 in reply_received (p_msg=0x7fe2e6a55ba0) at t_reply.c:2370
>>>#5 0x00000000004547f5 in do_forward_reply (msg=0x7fe2e6a55ba0, mode=<value optimized out>) at forward.c:799
>>>#6 0x000000000049a5ba in receive_msg (buf=<value optimized out>, len=961, rcv_info=0x7fff63fdfc40) at receive.c:270
>>>#7 0x00000000005281a6 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:544
>>>#8 0x0000000000464d3a in main_loop () at main.c:1638
>>>#9 0x0000000000467a6c in main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value optimized out>) at main.c:2566
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I suspend the transaction in one route and then I continue it in another route, similar to below:
>>>
>>>
>>>route[INVITE]
>>># Suspend and put to memcache:
>>>t_suspend();
>>> xlog("proceesing suspended in transaction [$T(id_index):$T(id_label)]\n");
>>> $var(transaction_index)=$T(id_index);
>>> $var(transaction_label)=$T(id_label);
>>>
>>> $mct(wait_$tU)= "" + $var(transaction_index) + ":" + $var(transaction_label);
>>> $mctex(wait_$tU) = 100;
>>>}
>>>
>>>
>>>route[INVITE_resume] {
>>>
>>>
>>># get the transaction index and lable from memcache
>>> $avp(check) = $mct(wait_$tU) ; # I should have the transaction index and the transaction label here
>>> $var(my_transaction_index) = $(avp(check){s.select,0,:});
>>> $var(my_transaction_label) = $(avp(check){s.select,1,:});
>>> $var(a)= $(var(my_transaction_index){s.int});
>>> $var(b) = $(var(my_transaction_label){s.int});
>>>
>>>
>>> t_continue( "$var(a)", "$var(b)" , "my_relay_route");
>>>}
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>route[INVITE_resume] executes only on an asynchronous event (a certain SIP message that might come or not) .
>>>
>>>
>>>I use kamailio 4.0.0/Centos Linux. I suspect it happened when I sent CANCEL, but I could not reproduce. I still have the core file.
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Dragos
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>>
>>--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin - http://conference.kamailio.com -
>>
>>
>
>--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin - http://conference.kamailio.com -
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>sr-dev mailing list
>sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20130404/0035b5b3/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list