[sr-dev] Status of outbound support
Juha Heinanen
jh at tutpro.com
Sat Dec 8 10:04:43 CET 2012
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> yes. Or, for getting the branch, if they become with too many
> parameters, then use the function that returns the pointer to the branch
> structure.
if we do that, then for consistency, get_branch and next_branch should
be dropped altogether and replaced by get_sip_branch (which already
exists) and get_next_sip_branch (which would be new).
i can do that if people feel that it is ok.
-- juha
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list