[sr-dev] Status of outbound support

Juha Heinanen jh at tutpro.com
Sat Dec 8 10:04:43 CET 2012


Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

> yes. Or, for getting the branch, if they become with too many 
> parameters, then use the function that returns the pointer to the branch 
> structure.

if we do that, then for consistency, get_branch and next_branch should
be dropped altogether and replaced by get_sip_branch (which already
exists) and get_next_sip_branch (which would be new).

i can do that if people feel that it is ok.

-- juha





More information about the sr-dev mailing list