[sr-dev] Status of outbound support

[Juha Heinanen]

Olle E. Johansson writes:

> > is this acceptable to everyone?  feel welcome to propose a better name
> > for next_contacts_skip().
> 
> next_contact_flow()
> 
> #If we have no spare flow for current contact, go to next q level.
> if (!next_contact_flow())
>    next_contacts();

there may be more than one flow left to try because more than one ua may
have registered the same aor, so better name would be
next_contact_flows.

-- juha